ms spot- prescreening advice

[dlowwa]

Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image.

Tail area a bit soft.

[flyetty]

Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image. Regards

Looks good to me, maybe a touch soft but leave to a screener

[ms spot]

Hello, could you please help me with this picture? The aircraft is in front of a non-lit background (forest). I'm happy for any advice on how to edit the image. Regards

[dlowwa]

Hello, could this picture have a chance? If not, please name the rejection reasons.

Soft/dark/contrast.

[ms spot]

Hello, could this picture have a chance? If not, please name the rejection reasons. Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hello, could you please prescreen the following two images? I'm especially concerned about horizon and exposure...

Dark/harsh contrast.

[ms spot]

Hello, could you please prescreen the following two images? I'm especially concerned about horizon and exposure...

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hello, I had a couple of pictures rejected in a row, mainly due to "Dark/Underexposed". Maybe this is a bit subjective so I am okay with it, but the following image (among others) was also rejected for "Bad postprocessing". Hence I would like to know of what this bad processing consists and how I can enhance the image's quality:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10927467

Regards

Editing halos visible.

[ms spot]

Hello, I had a couple of pictures rejected in a row, mainly due to "Dark/Underexposed". Maybe this is a bit subjective so I am okay with it, but the following image (among others) was also rejected for "Bad postprocessing". Hence I would like to know of what this bad processing consists and how I can enhance the image's quality:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10927467

Regards

[dlowwa]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.

I do not share your opinion.

[Charlie Chang]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

Thank you!

not screener
correctly rejected

[ms spot]

Hello, as you can hopefully see, the following images were both rejected for "Dark/Underexposed". However, I actually added a lot of additional exposure when editing them. Hence I would like to know if you share my opinion that they were incorrectly rejected.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584489

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10584460

Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.
Thank you!

1. dark
2. borderline contrast
3. dark/contrast

[ms spot]

Hello, I'd would like to have an opinion on the following pictures, main concerns are lightning and overall quality.

Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello, would you please have a look at the following picture and tell me if it's acceptable / why it would be rejected:

Maybe a touch soft/needing CW rotation, but would be ok for me.