Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This !
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oslplanespotting - prescreening request / editing advice
Collapse
X
-
When just the top of tail is missing like here, yes it's a cut-off rejection
Contrast is too dull for me on the 330
Regards
Alex
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
From other similar shots I've seen on JP they've always shifted the plane down in the frame to include the top of the tail
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post1st one shouzld be ok even if contrast sin'r optimal.
2nd has strong chances of rejection due to dull contrast
Kind Regards
Alex
Is this one better?
And is this Cutoff ok?
Leave a comment:
-
1st one shouzld be ok even if contrast sin'r optimal.
2nd has strong chances of rejection due to dull contrast
Kind Regards
Alex
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Not sure what you mean. What is 'original'?
Would it be acceptable as that?
Thanks in advantage and a happy new year to you!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Not really night shot.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
1. soft, dark, overprocessed. yes night shot.
2. borderline soft/horizon
3. motive
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Borderline contrast.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: