Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by philhIs this good for anything or is it entirely motiveless? Im leaning towards the latter although I quite like it for the personals.
Comment
-
Fair point.
As I said in my previous post,I love the shape of the forward section of the 747 and think it looks good filling a frame, showing the size and elegance, so that is
my personal motive whenever I take a shot like that.
I suppose my question should have been 'would that motive be passable for Jetphotos', especially as there is only a fraction of the aircraft in the shot, rather than how I first worded it.
Comment
-
Motiv
Hi,
Would this be an acceptable motiv and would the heat from the engines be too detirmental? I quite like this but can well understand why others might not.
Thanks
Needs a little more contrast too perhaps but its hard to tell on this lap top.Last edited by cja; 2007-01-22, 16:27.
Comment
-
Originally posted by philhWas that at Mach? If so where exactly do you stand for those as the three times Ive been Im never above the flightline and its really annoying.
Comment
-
Didn't see this forum till now, or I would have posted my questions from last night here.
Here are ones I have re-done since trying the tips from a workflow site I found today. Any uploadable?
The last one I had to resize to post here. So other than the compression artifacts...?
Comment
-
Mark, I would upload #1 and #2. That's speaking as Senior Screener. As photographer, I would try to squeeze them all in, as they are superb
#4 looks too soft or blurry to me.
Comment
Comment