Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!

[Joop]

Hello,

can someone explain me what is wrong with the contrast?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3671943

This one got accpeted while it was taken at same date/place/conditions with 5 minutes inbetween..

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=7262459

[LX-A343]

Joop, you could also wait for the appeal to be screened or your post to be answered, instead of doing both at the same time. It would be a bigger help for you.

[rmk2112]

Hi all,
Just had this shot rejected "as similar". Even though I've no other shots of F-Pier in the database. I appealed and recieved the reply:

Admin Comments >> there is hardly any difference to some of your other AMS ramp photos. Different traffic is not taken into consideration, as the main subject is the ramp itself.

This seems a bit extreme as my other ramp shots don't show the aircraft here and as I say, I have no other of this pier at schiphol. In addition my other ramp shots have been my most popular, showing viwers like to see these shots.
Anyhow, my question is, the main reason I took the shot and uploaded it was to show a close up detail of PH-BQP's tiles, I asked in the forum whether "ramp or aircraft" and was advised "ramp". Would it be accepted if re-uploaded as "aircraft".
If you're still here, then thanks for reading all this
Regards
René

[jeremydando]

Had a horizon level reject on this one. Any pointers on what I should level to?

Thanks,

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672197

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Had a horizon level reject on this one. Any pointers on what I should level to?

Thanks,

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672197

Hi,
A 0.4 CCW rotation should do it

Regards
Alex

[rmk2112]

Hi ya
Just had these 2 rejected for being unlevel,

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672889

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672888

I appealed and recieved the following rejection reasons:

"the buildings in the background are all leaning to the right"

"again, the buildings are leaning to the right. Perhaps less, than on the other appealed photo, but nevertheless considerably"


I've attached zoomed in images that to me atleast show the buildings are vertical,certainly not "considerably" leaning . I would appreciate a second opinion and any thoughts as to how to make them right
Thanks as always!!
Regards
René

[Bjorn1979]

Good evening,

Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3671065

Cheers
Bjorn

[RingwaySam]

Good evening,

Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3671065

Cheers
Bjorn

I don't think so Bjorn, it's quite noticeable. 0.90 CCW seems to work, atleast for me. See what you think.

Sam

[magic48]

Hi ya
Just had these 2 rejected for being unlevel,

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672889

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3672888

I appealed and recieved the following rejection reasons:

"the buildings in the background are all leaning to the right"

"again, the buildings are leaning to the right. Perhaps less, than on the other appealed photo, but nevertheless considerably"


I've attached zoomed in images that to me atleast show the buildings are vertical,certainly not "considerably" leaning . I would appreciate a second opinion and any thoughts as to how to make them right
Thanks as always!!
Regards
René

Hi René, I agree with the senior as I'm afraid using such short reference lines is prone to producing unlevel results. In the Norwegian shot, the best reference to use is the light pole above the aircraft as it's about perfectly in the middle of the frame and fairly long. As for the Jetairfly, the white building behind the plane does seem to be slightly leaning. Again, I'd use the large light pole at the top.

Good evening,

Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3671065

Cheers
Bjorn

Hi Bjorn, the power poles as well as the red-and-white light poles do seem to be leaning.

[Bjorn1979]

Thanks Sam and Gianluca, indeed no chance for appeal. I made a new one, think this one is better leveled now.

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1971/img6159bewerkt.jpg

Cheers
Bjorn

[rmk2112]

Thanks Gianluca
Regards
René

[rbrownrigg]

Im stumped

I had this photo rejected again after I fixed it (bad centering and too much too little contrast) Now it was rejected again for the same reason. Who can give me some pointers on this?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3673960

I dont understand how could it not be centered! I also take it that it needs more contrast? Comments? Suggestions? Thanks guys!

[atco]

The contrast I don't get at all, looks fine to me. Histogram is right where it should be.

Its very clearly not centred though.
The horizontal centre of this shot should be through the windowline, whereas you currently have it at the bottom of the red stripe.

I had this photo rejected again after I fixed it (bad centering and too much too little contrast) Now it was rejected again for the same reason. Who can give me some pointers on this?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3673960

I dont understand how could it not be centered! I also take it that it needs more contrast? Comments? Suggestions? Thanks guys!

[LX-A343]

Thanks Sam and Gianluca, indeed no chance for appeal. I made a new one, think this one is better leveled now.

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1971/img6159bewerkt.jpg

Cheers
Bjorn

I can't help it, but it still looks like leaning a bit to the right. As a screener, that's just another of horror location to screen photos from

[Bjorn1979]

Thanks Gerardo, not only for screeners its a horror location. For us it's horror too to get it acceptable