If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!
Joop, you could also wait for the appeal to be screened or your post to be answered, instead of doing both at the same time. It would be a bigger help for you.
Hi all,
Just had this shot rejected "as similar". Even though I've no other shots of F-Pier in the database. I appealed and recieved the reply:
Admin Comments >> there is hardly any difference to some of your other AMS ramp photos. Different traffic is not taken into consideration, as the main subject is the ramp itself.
This seems a bit extreme as my other ramp shots don't show the aircraft here and as I say, I have no other of this pier at schiphol. In addition my other ramp shots have been my most popular, showing viwers like to see these shots.
Anyhow, my question is, the main reason I took the shot and uploaded it was to show a close up detail of PH-BQP's tiles, I asked in the forum whether "ramp or aircraft" and was advised "ramp". Would it be accepted if re-uploaded as "aircraft".
If you're still here, then thanks for reading all this
Regards
René
I appealed and recieved the following rejection reasons:
"the buildings in the background are all leaning to the right"
"again, the buildings are leaning to the right. Perhaps less, than on the other appealed photo, but nevertheless considerably"
I've attached zoomed in images that to me atleast show the buildings are vertical,certainly not "considerably" leaning . I would appreciate a second opinion and any thoughts as to how to make them right
Thanks as always!!
Regards
René
Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.
Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.
I appealed and recieved the following rejection reasons:
"the buildings in the background are all leaning to the right"
"again, the buildings are leaning to the right. Perhaps less, than on the other appealed photo, but nevertheless considerably"
I've attached zoomed in images that to me atleast show the buildings are vertical,certainly not "considerably" leaning . I would appreciate a second opinion and any thoughts as to how to make them right
Thanks as always!!
Regards
René
Hi René, I agree with the senior as I'm afraid using such short reference lines is prone to producing unlevel results. In the Norwegian shot, the best reference to use is the light pole above the aircraft as it's about perfectly in the middle of the frame and fairly long. As for the Jetairfly, the white building behind the plane does seem to be slightly leaning. Again, I'd use the large light pole at the top.
Yesterday i got this one rejected for horizon unlevel. As i don't fully disagree with the reason for rejection i would like to know if a an appeal would have a chance.
I had this photo rejected again after I fixed it (bad centering and too much too little contrast) Now it was rejected again for the same reason. Who can give me some pointers on this?
The contrast I don't get at all, looks fine to me. Histogram is right where it should be.
Its very clearly not centred though.
The horizontal centre of this shot should be through the windowline, whereas you currently have it at the bottom of the red stripe.
I had this photo rejected again after I fixed it (bad centering and too much too little contrast) Now it was rejected again for the same reason. Who can give me some pointers on this?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment