New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[Alex - Spot-This !]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9696[/ATTACH]

Hi appreciate views on composition etc...
Cheers T

Plane is too small compared to the whole frame. + the church in the shadow kills the whole motive as it's not given balance to the lit aircraft.

Best regards
Alex

[777MAN]

Plane is too small compared to the whole frame. + the church in the shadow kills the whole motive as it's not given balance to the lit aircraft.

Best regards
Alex

Thanks for the quick response Alex, appreciated.

Tony

[DirtyCrow]

I got these three rejected for "soft" and reworked them. Are they sharp enough to repupload?
Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hi,
Is this photo ok for upload?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9651[/ATTACH]

No, fence is blocking the wheels.

hello,
are these photo ok for upload?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9655[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9656[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9657[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9658[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9659[/ATTACH]

thank you for your help

No, they would be rejected for various reasons:

1. dark, dirty
2. borderline soft, compression
3. dark, dirty
4. soft, compression, dirty
5. oversharpened, noise

[dlowwa]

Hello JP team. Thank you for all your feedback.

Please check these new images.

1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9660[/ATTACH]
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9661[/ATTACH]
3.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9700[/ATTACH]
4.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9703[/ATTACH]
5.[ATTACH=CONFIG]9702[/ATTACH]

1. ok
2. borderline soft (tail)
3. contrast
4. borderline contrast
5. contrast, soft, color, horizon (angle) looks strange as well

hi jp team please prescreen
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9662[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9663[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9664[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]9665[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]9666[/ATTACH]

thanks

1. soft, overprocessed
2. contrast, overprocessed
3. borderline contrast
4. color, horizon
5. soft, horizon

[dlowwa]

Hello! After not noticing the feedback a few days ago, I have re edited these shots. Are they any better? Prescreened info last time was the 737 was borderline oversharpened and the 787 was dark/contrast. Thank you, once again!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9667[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9668[/ATTACH][

Same for both again.

I tried to update the pictures I uploaded yesterday. I think there is less overexposure on the updated ones and I changed the contrast as well. I hope the compression in the sky is fixed too. Thanks for investing your time in this, I know I ask frequently for a pre-screen but as a beginner on JP, I have limited queue slots so that's why I want to be sure.

1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9674[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9675[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9676[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9677[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]9678[/ATTACH]

The light is still harsh on the first four, and they all look a bit soft, but I suppose close to being passable. Last one should be ok.

[dlowwa]

Hi JP Team... please evaluate these shots. Thank you!
1[ATTACH=CONFIG]9679[/ATTACH] 2[ATTACH=CONFIG]9680[/ATTACH] 3[ATTACH=CONFIG]9681[/ATTACH] 4[ATTACH=CONFIG]9682[/ATTACH] 5[ATTACH=CONFIG]9683[/ATTACH]

1. soft, borderline dark
2. soft, color, horizon
3. soft, dark
4. soft, dark
5. dark, horizon

Hello. Would you kindly evaluate these? Thank you.

1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9684[/ATTACH]

2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9685[/ATTACH]

3 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9686[/ATTACH]

4 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9687[/ATTACH]

5 [ATTACH=CONFIG]9688[/ATTACH]

1. Too far, centering, soft, dirty
2. soft, dirty
3. heat haze, soft, contrast, color, dirty
4. soft, contrast, dirty
5. soft, contrast, dirty

[dlowwa]

Hello dlowwa,

Is vignetting still a relevant issue on this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9690[/ATTACH]

Yes.

can you also give your opinion on these ones:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9691[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9692[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9693[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9694[/ATTACH]

All look passable to me.

I got these three rejected for "soft" and reworked them. Are they sharp enough to repupload?
Thank you.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]9697[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9698[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]9699[/ATTACH]

First two maybe ok, third still a little soft. All would benefit from increased contrast as well.

[boiko90]

Hello
could you please check this photo:

Thank you!

[KyleMcKinlay]

Thanks for the feedback as always. I think I'll just give those shots a miss and focus on better lighting next time. How are these shots? Also, for the Gatwick line up shot, am I correct in saying that it would come under 'ramp'? If so, does that eliminate the 'airport overview' category? Thanks as always

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello dlowwa, thanks again for your help =)

When possible can you give me you opinion on these two please:

[Ellx]

Hi,
Ist this photo ok?
thank you for prescreening.

[crisquijano]

Thank you for all previous feedback.
Here`s a couple more.

1.
2.

[wkd001]

Want to ask advice for a couple.

[Sergio Canobbio]

1. soft, borderline dark

1. Too far, centering, soft, dirty
2. soft, dirty
3. heat haze, soft, contrast, color, dirty
4. soft, contrast, dirty
5. soft, contrast, dirty

Thank you!