New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[FederalAce]

Thoughts?

[MarkLawrence]

It is way too soft...

Thanks Stephan!

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello!
Are these ok for upload? Thanks for the help!

[dlowwa]

Hi everyone! Can you please pre-screen this photo? It was only rejected for JPG artefact compression, so I edited it the exact same way, but this time in FULL SIZE! I only compressed it AFTER the editing!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8499[/ATTACH]

I don't see compression being an issue.

Hi, please pre screen this, i usualy get rejected for "Undersharpened (Soft)". Thanks /Niklas

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8503[/ATTACH]
At dawn.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8504[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8508[/ATTACH]
at dawn

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8506[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8507[/ATTACH]
Early morning, into the sun

They mostly have issues with underexposure/contrast, but yes, the last one is noticeably soft as well.

[dlowwa]

Hi JP team!
Please pre-screen these:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8509[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8510[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8511[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8512[/ATTACH]

Quality looks ok on all of them, but I see the crop being an issue on all of them as well. A bit awkward on the first two; the third has the tail cut off, and the fourth is a little unbalanced to the left side.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8518[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]8519[/ATTACH]

Thoughts?

First is already in the queue, so no comment. Second is borderline for contrast & noise.

Hello!
Are these ok for upload? Thanks for the help!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8520[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8521[/ATTACH]

Don't see any major issues with either.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello Again!

What do you think about these two? (different planes) and sorry for bothering again.

[alfian.massagony]

hello, is this ok? thank you

[Lat1918]

Was wondering if these would be acceptable or if they need some work to still fix them?

[dlowwa]

Hello Again!

What do you think about these two? (different planes) and sorry for bothering again.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8524[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8523[/ATTACH]

Contrast is an issue for both, as well as crop for the first and horizon for the second.

hello, is this ok? thank you
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8525[/ATTACH]

This would be rejected for bad processing due to the strong halos visible around the aircraft.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8526[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8527[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8528[/ATTACH]
Was wondering if these would be acceptable or if they need some work to still fix them?

Composition/centering is an issue on the first and second; first and third are borderline for softness/haze but should be passable in that regard; second has contrast issues and significant banding in the sky from compression.

[FederalAce]

I'm deleting my original photo of N6815B because it has some fence contrasting the photo, but I made another edit of a different photo and wanted thoughts on it. This photo will replace the original.

[dlowwa]

I'm deleting my original photo of N6815B because it has some fence contrasting the photo, but I made another edit of a different photo and wanted thoughts on it. This photo will replace the original.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8529[/ATTACH]

Poor crop/centering.

[Eduardo Paixão Silva]

Hello dlowwa.
Is contrast, horizon and crop (the first one the crop shows both wheels) ok now? The line of the fence in the background is my horizon. Thanks

[niklas]

They mostly have issues with underexposure/contrast, but yes, the last one is noticeably soft as well.

Hi, thanks, how much are we talking about? ,5 steps ish? The dawn and early morning photos, u need them to be lighter also?

[niklas]

Increased the exposure and added a little more contrast


Increased the exposure


Increased the exposure


was rejected for dust and backlit, removed dust will appeal backlit.


Was rejected for soft and backlit, added sharpeness want to appeal backlit

[MarkLawrence]

It is way too soft...

Have increased the sharpening a whole lot - does this make it better?