Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [QUOTE=dlowwa;652207]This would be rejected for dark & contrast.

    Thanks anyway. Not going to upload it. exposure can be lifted, but at that time it contains other problems such as the histogram and as you mentioned contrast.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9237.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	999.8 KB
ID:	1016532

    Got another one, got some doubts about the sharpness.

    Comment


    • Hi JP team, please pre-screen this. The 2nd one is a new version based on recent feedback. Thank you for taking the time to do this.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	VOLARIS_N526VL_28AUG17_1200_toff.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	467.1 KB
ID:	1016533
      Click image for larger version

Name:	AeroMexico_EI-DRD_02AUG17_1600_MdAir.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	688.0 KB
ID:	1016534
      Click image for larger version

Name:	Wingo_HP-1378CMP_02AUG17_1600_ProfileLanding.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	965.7 KB
ID:	1016535

      Comment


      • Originally posted by niklas View Post
        Hi, thanks, how much are we talking about? ,5 steps ish? The dawn and early morning photos, u need them to be lighter also?
        To stand a better chance, most need a slight increase in brightness. The last two have issues with poor light/contrast, and I don't think they can necessarily be fixed simply by adding a little more contrast.

        Originally posted by MarkLawrence View Post
        Have increased the sharpening a whole lot - does this make it better?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]8538[/ATTACH]
        Not really. The softness is being caused by heat haze, something which is not fixable.

        Comment


        • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0444-N531AS-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	659.3 KB
ID:	1016537
          Hello dlowwa, I fixed the issue with centering and did another edit of the picture. Is it still too soft?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
            Hello dlowwa.
            Is contrast, horizon and crop (the first one the crop shows both wheels) ok now? The line of the fence in the background is my horizon. Thanks

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]8530[/ATTACH]

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]8531[/ATTACH]
            Hello dlowwa, when possible can you give your opinion on these two. Thanks

            Comment


            • Hello Screeners.

              This one was rejected due to "Too much or too little contrast", is it better now?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1689PS3x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	569.7 KB
ID:	1016538

              This one was rejected due to "Too much or too little contrast" and "Dark / Underexposed", is it better now?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1085ps3x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	525.1 KB
ID:	1016539

              Is this one ok? Thanks!

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3968ps1x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	503.4 KB
ID:	1016540

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                Hello dlowwa.
                Is contrast, horizon and crop (the first one the crop shows both wheels) ok now? The line of the fence in the background is my horizon. Thanks

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8530[/ATTACH]

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8531[/ATTACH]
                Second still looks like it needs a little CW rotation.

                Originally posted by niklas View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8532[/ATTACH]
                Increased the exposure and added a little more contrast

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8533[/ATTACH]
                Increased the exposure

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8534[/ATTACH]
                Increased the exposure

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8536[/ATTACH]
                was rejected for dust and backlit, removed dust will appeal backlit.

                [ATTACH=CONFIG]8537[/ATTACH]
                Was rejected for soft and backlit, added sharpeness want to appeal backlit
                1. passable
                2. borderline dark
                3. ok for me
                4 & 5. they are backlit. can't really appeal that.

                Comment


                • [QUOTE=wkd001;652349]
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  This would be rejected for dark & contrast.

                  Thanks anyway. Not going to upload it. exposure can be lifted, but at that time it contains other problems such as the histogram and as you mentioned contrast.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8539[/ATTACH]

                  Got another one, got some doubts about the sharpness.
                  A touch dark & soft, but otherwise ok.

                  Originally posted by crisquijano View Post
                  Hi JP team, please pre-screen this. The 2nd one is a new version based on recent feedback. Thank you for taking the time to do this.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8540[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8541[/ATTACH]
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]8542[/ATTACH]
                  1. a bit soft
                  2. soft
                  3. top of fuselage almost blown out

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8544[/ATTACH]
                    Hello dlowwa, I fixed the issue with centering and did another edit of the picture. Is it still too soft?
                    Sharpness ok, but it is quite dark.

                    Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                    Hello Screeners.

                    This one was rejected due to "Too much or too little contrast", is it better now?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8545[/ATTACH]

                    This one was rejected due to "Too much or too little contrast" and "Dark / Underexposed", is it better now?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8546[/ATTACH]

                    Is this one ok? Thanks!

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]8547[/ATTACH]
                    Contrast is still quite harsh on the first two. Not sure you can fix that. Third looks ok to me.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      Sharpness ok, but it is quite dark.



                      Contrast is still quite harsh on the first two. Not sure you can fix that. Third looks ok to me.
                      Hello dlowwa.
                      Because i really like these two photos i just ask you to look at them again (i adjust contrast one more time). If not good i will give up. Thanks for your time.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1689PS4x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	646.9 KB
ID:	1016541

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1085ps4x1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	587.3 KB
ID:	1016542

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        Sharpness ok, but it is quite dark.
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0444-N531AS-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	724.7 KB
ID:	1016543
                        I adjusted the brightness. Is it still too dark?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Eduardo Paixão Silva View Post
                          Hello dlowwa.
                          Because i really like these two photos i just ask you to look at them again (i adjust contrast one more time). If not good i will give up. Thanks for your time.

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8548[/ATTACH]

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8550[/ATTACH]
                          Your decision whether to submit or not, but they're still most likely dark/contrast rejections.

                          Originally posted by Lat1918 View Post
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]8551[/ATTACH]
                          I adjusted the brightness. Is it still too dark?
                          Yes.

                          Comment


                          • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0444-N531AS-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	768.8 KB
ID:	1016544
                            Still too dark? Or is it fixed?

                            Comment


                            • Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZRJ-EGCC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	664.3 KB
ID:	1016545

                              What do you think of its chance of acceptance in the db?

                              Cheers Tony

                              Comment


                              • Hi again. Please pre-screen these. Thank YOU!Click image for larger version

Name:	Aerobell_TI-BAJ_30AUG17_1600_MidAir.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	676.8 KB
ID:	1016546Click image for larger version

Name:	MSP_MSP005_30AUG17_1200_profile.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	613.6 KB
ID:	1016547Click image for larger version

Name:	DELTA_N301DQ_30AUG17_1600_toff.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	779.2 KB
ID:	1016548Click image for larger version

Name:	Nordic_N758BC_30AUG17_1200_34sParalela.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	675.8 KB
ID:	1016549

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X