New Pre-Screening Thread - CREW reply only

[LX-A343]

Guys?

Any thoughts on this one?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8449[/ATTACH]

thanks

Looks OK for me. I would accept it and I think, other screeners as well.

But maybe try to play around with sharpening and/or (maybe, I'm not sure) noise reduction to reduce the fine jagged lines for example along the cheat lines.

[Majky737]

Hi,

Can someone prescreen these photos please?

Thank you.
Marian

[MadridSpotter]

Hello, do you see these as acceptable?

TIA.

[Lat1918]

Was wondering if these would be acceptable for uploading, if not what could I do to fix them. Or just leaving in my personal collection?

[dlowwa]

Here is my photo after put some improvemtns from our forum friends tip! It`s ok now? Can I improve some aspect?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8437[/ATTACH]

Better, but still not guaranteed to be accepted due to softness in some areas.

how about this one? what details can I improve? I think I can sharp more the right engine...I'm right?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8442[/ATTACH]

The whole image is very soft. Once again your camera settings make no sense.. f/20 & ISO1400? No reason for either of those settings, and they both are contributing to the softness, especially the very narrow aperture setting.

Hello, after the bad news from previous pre screening I hope this one will be ok
Thank you.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8440[/ATTACH]

Noisy and a little soft, but no other major issues.

[dlowwa]

Hi there, would greatly appreciate any feedback on both images. The AAL 737 was pre-screened on this thread before and I was told it had some noise, although I have tried to reduce that. Thank you!

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8443[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8444[/ATTACH]

First is soft, and second a bit as well, although borderline acceptable for me.

Is this acceptable?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8446[/ATTACH]

Also a bit soft, but otherwise ok.

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can someone prescreen these photos please?

Thank you.
Marian

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8451[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8452[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8453[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8454[/ATTACH]

Quality would be ok for me.

Hello, do you see these as acceptable?

TIA.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8456[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8457[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8458[/ATTACH]

First has obstruction on the nose gear, and would also be considered similar with the second. Quality on the other two should be acceptable.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]8459[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8460[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]8461[/ATTACH]
Was wondering if these would be acceptable for uploading, if not what could I do to fix them. Or just leaving in my personal collection?

First won't have much of a chance, but the second is not bad. The third needs brightening and sharpening, but could be made passable.

[Nick Aviation Photos]

Hi everyone! Could you please pre-screen these photos? Thank you!

[Julian S.]

Hey

I´ve reedited my one of my pictures and like to ask if this is now acceptable.

Thank you very much in advance.

[vcruvinel]

Better, but still not guaranteed to be accepted due to softness in some areas.

dlowwa, many thanks! I will improve my camera settings and take more shots

[KyleMcKinlay]

Thanks for the feedback. Do you mean that just the second is borderline soft or both? Thanks!

[Degupukas]

hello, is this ok?
thanks.

[alfian.massagony]

How about these, is ok? thank you

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the feedback. Do you mean that just the second is borderline soft or both? Thanks!

Just the second.

hello, is this ok?
thanks.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8469[/ATTACH]

This would be rejected for multiple reasons, including soft and over processed.

How about these, is ok? thank you
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8472[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]8473[/ATTACH]

Strong editing halos visible on both, so would be rejected for over processed.

[alfian.massagony]

Strong editing halos visible on both, so would be rejected for over processed.

What your suggestion dlowwa to fix it?