Originally posted by YanS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
YanS - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Thank you, Alex for your fast answer
Yes, I seem to have an issue with compressed sky in pictures with much visible sky in the background. As I always save my pictures at the highest possible quality I don‘t know what is causing this at the moment but I will work on that for sure.
Are there chances of acceptance for 1 and 2 (As compression is especially noticable in #3)?
Thanks for your thoughts,
All the best,
Yannick
Leave a comment:
-
Hi everyone,
Thank you, Alex for your fast answer
Yes, I seem to have an issue with compressed sky in pictures with much visible sky in the background. As I always save my pictures at the highest possible quality I don‘t know what is causing this at the moment but I will work on that for sure.
Are there chances of acceptance for 1 and 2 (As compression is especially noticable in #3)?
Thanks for your thoughts,
All the best,
Yannick
Leave a comment:
-
They look ok... except about the compressed sky. Specially noticeable on the 737 with visible pixels.
Regards
Alex
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Thanks LX-A343 for your helpful feedback .
I tried to correct the TUI-issues. I think it's slightly better now but I don't know if it's enough. A feedback would be great.
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]24943[/ATTACH]
This Piper would be new to the database but I'm not sure about the horizon.
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]24944[/ATTACH]
Thanks for your time,
All the best,
Yannick
2. ok
Leave a comment:
-
Hi everyone,
Thanks LX-A343 for your helpful feedback .
I tried to correct the TUI-issues. I think it's slightly better now but I don't know if it's enough. A feedback would be great.
1.
This Piper would be new to the database but I'm not sure about the horizon.
2.
Thanks for your time,
All the best,
Yannick
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHello everyone,
A feedback on these would very nice .
1.[ATTACH=CONFIG]24855[/ATTACH] (borderline dark/contrast for me)
2.[ATTACH=CONFIG]24856[/ATTACH] (not sure about color and compression in the sky here)
Thanks for your answers,
Best regards,
Yannick
2: slightly soft, noisy background, verticals seem slightly leaning to the right.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
A feedback on these would be great .
1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]23738[/ATTACH]
2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]23737[/ATTACH] (not sure about exposure and horizon here and if it's too similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8959388 )
3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]23736[/ATTACH] (not sure about exposure here aswell and if it is too soft)
Thanks for your time,
Best regards,
Yannick
2. blurry, compression
3. ok
Leave a comment:
-
Hi everyone,
A feedback on these would be great .
1.
2. (not sure about exposure and horizon here and if it's too similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8959388 )
3. (not sure about exposure here aswell and if it is too soft)
Thanks for your time,
Best regards,
Yannick
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by YanS View PostHi everyone,
Today these pictures were rejected for being backlit:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
The first one is borderline for me too but as pretty much of the fuselage is lit and as it was OK in pre-screening (which is no guarantee of course) it would be discussable in my eyes.
The second one looks ok in terms of light in my opinion.
But of course these are only personal views so I ask here if one of them (or both) would be worth an appeal.
Thanks for your help,
Best regards
Yannick
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: