If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thanks a lot Dana, I'll try my luck with 1,3 and 4
I would like advice/prescreen on these four images.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25409[/ATTACH] It's another snap as this rejected image https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7344798.
Sharpness should be better on this one, but I do have a lot of concern about the contrast. if this one fails, I'll try to rework the rejected version.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25410[/ATTACH] Very afraid of contrast on this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25411[/ATTACH] Not sure on sharpness on this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25412[/ATTACH] Not sure on sharpness/exposure and contrast on this one.
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards.
1. bit soft towards the edges, right side especially
2. borderline contrast
3-4 borderline overexposed
Borderline, but would have been acceptable for me. Wait a few hours, then maybe consider an appeal, should have a decent chance.
OK Thanks Dana, I decided to appeal and it got accepted.
I would like advice/pre-screen on two images.
I reworked and resized it. Is it better now? The original file from the reject is too bad, so Iwould like to try this one. Besides potential issues, I would like to know if it's too similar with this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8571146. Angle is, but light is quite different and more than two years later.
OK Thanks Dana, I decided to appeal and it got accepted.
I would like advice/pre-screen on two images.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25552[/ATTACH] I reworked and resized it. Is it better now? The original file from the reject is too bad, so Iwould like to try this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25553[/ATTACH] Besides potential issues, I would like to know if it's too similar with this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8571146. Angle is, but light is quite different and more than two years later.
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards.
1: looks OK
2: too similar. TBH, I would ask for a deletion of the photo in the db and then upload this one.
1: looks OK
2: too similar. TBH, I would ask for a deletion of the photo in the db and then upload this one.
OK Thanks a lot Geri,
Remaining with one question tough,
Do I have to let the old photo of the KLM 787-9 delete first in the database and after that upload the new one?
Or can I upload the new one and ask for deletion of the old one, together with the upload? as replacing.
I've also thought about that indeed
The rules are not really clear to me on that point.
Hello, I would like prescreen/advice on these five photos from a recent trip to Frankfurt/ EDDF
Early morning shot with sunlight on this side of the tail. Any guidance if not acceptable would be appreciated. Not sure on sharpness of this one. Very unsure of contrast of this one. I think I've done something wrong with processing. belly looks weird. Contrast/exposure. Some gloomy light on the aircraft.
Hello, I would like prescreen/advice on these five photos from a recent trip to Frankfurt/ EDDF
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25786[/ATTACH] Early morning shot with sunlight on this side of the tail. Any guidance if not acceptable would be appreciated.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25787[/ATTACH] Not sure on sharpness of this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25788[/ATTACH] Very unsure of contrast of this one.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25789[/ATTACH] I think I've done something wrong with processing. belly looks weird.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25790[/ATTACH] Contrast/exposure. Some gloomy light on the aircraft.
#1 This is another snap of #1 from the previous post,What's the way to go with the contrast here as I don't really know what to do here
I captured several aircrafts this way and I would like to try to make them acceptable here. Any guidance would be appreciated.
If there are any other issues here, i would like to know as well
#2 This is a re-edit of this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7383398. I can deal with the underexposed, Although the aircraft looks stronger to my with underexposure on a night shot
But that's my opinion. Technical it's right and I know.
But what's wrong with the contrast? i have no idea.
Any guidance and a possible prescreen at the re-edit would be appreciated.
#1 [ATTACH=CONFIG]25963[/ATTACH] This is another snap of #1 from the previous post,What's the way to go with the contrast here as I don't really know what to do here
I captured several aircrafts this way and I would like to try to make them acceptable here. Any guidance would be appreciated.
If there are any other issues here, i would like to know as well
#2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]25964[/ATTACH] This is a re-edit of this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7383398. I can deal with the underexposed, Although the aircraft looks stronger to my with underexposure on a night shot
But that's my opinion. Technical it's right and I know.
But what's wrong with the contrast? i have no idea.
Any guidance and a possible prescreen at the re-edit would be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance!
Best Regards
1. very borderline dark/contrast. not quite silhouette shot, but kind of too dark to see much. also soft.
2. tail soft, otherwise ok for me
Fortunately I could add sharpness to the KLM 787-9 and I will drop it in the queue.
As I'm still unsure about the silhouette photos I would like to ask pre-screen for two different photos which are editted in a different way.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25989[/ATTACH] A China Southern Boeing 777F, My first photo from that morning. Made that dark to show the condensation, but also unsure about the Sky.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25992[/ATTACH] A Qatar Boeing 777-300ER, with better light, although brightening it up more, would result in a contrast reject I think.
Which one would have the best chance or less re-edit, to make it to the db.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards.
Second maybe a bit better, but both really still too dark (both aircraft and background) to really achieve that silhouette effect, imho.
Second maybe a bit better, but both really still too dark (both aircraft and background) to really achieve that silhouette effect, imho.
OK, Thanks Dana,
Maybe I'll rework the CZ (and also the SAA) later as the QR will suffer contrast reject with brighting.
Another reason is there are also other images for me I would like prescreen/advice about these five
Don't know what to think about especially the right side of the aircraft. it's a little blending with the sky. especially exposure. sharpness and contrast. especially exposure sharpness/exposure/contrast
Maybe I'll rework the CZ (and also the SAA) later as the QR will suffer contrast reject with brighting.
Another reason is there are also other images for me I would like prescreen/advice about these five
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26054[/ATTACH] Don't know what to think about especially the right side of the aircraft. it's a little blending with the sky.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26055[/ATTACH] especially exposure.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26056[/ATTACH] sharpness and contrast.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26057[/ATTACH] especially exposure
[ATTACH=CONFIG]26058[/ATTACH] sharpness/exposure/contrast
Thanks in advance.
Last one looks almost backlit, but that's probably just the paint. Rest look ok.
Last one looks almost backlit, but that's probably just the paint. Rest look ok.
Thanks Dana for your time,
Got three questions at the moment.
First of all this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7398274. I've seen similar photos being accepted (OK on the ground)
But due to the indirect light and the dark clouds I think there should be something acceptable being possible.
Is there any guidance on this one possible?
And I do have two photos for prescreen which give me doubts
very afraid of overexposure at least on this one. Not sure on especially horizon on this one.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment