wkd001- Editing advice

[wkd001]

1. soft
2. soft/blurry
3. contrast. not fixable.
4. borderline soft

OK thanks a lot Dana,

I re-edited #!1 from this post Is it any better? a second thought would be appreciated


I would also like a prescreen on two other images

Personally I think it's too soft, also caused by conditions and maybe the color is not good.

Diffuse sunlight here. borderline or just an ordinary contrast reject here? Maybe sharpness and color are also not good.

If had missed any relevant stuff here for making it acceptable for JP i would like to know as well.

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

To my surprise i've found some old RAW-files from a visit to CDG some years ago.
I've re-edited them an would like to know if they have any chance for acceptance here.
So a prescreen would be nice here.
Note : they were taken with my old camera and lens

Biggest concerns are the glare, color and maybe contrast and softness,

Here are glare and softness my biggest concerns,

Biggest concerns here are softness, contrast, exposure and backlit. (early morning arrival).Personally I think a no-go.

Only a small concern of contrast and softness,

Thanks in advance.

1. soft
2. soft/blurry
3. contrast. not fixable.
4. borderline soft

[wkd001]

Hello,

To my surprise i've found some old RAW-files from a visit to CDG some years ago.
I've re-edited them an would like to know if they have any chance for acceptance here.
So a prescreen would be nice here.
Note : they were taken with my old camera and lens

Biggest concerns are the glare, color and maybe contrast and softness,

Here are glare and softness my biggest concerns,

Biggest concerns here are softness, contrast, exposure and backlit. (early morning arrival).Personally I think a no-go.

Only a small concern of contrast and softness,

Thanks in advance.

[dlowwa]

I've received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8393830 and i don't really agree on this one

Oversharpen, I can imagine, seeing some jaggies, but don't think it ain't that bad IMO.
Heat haze I don't understand ,as there is no haze affecting the main subject.

It's noticeable on the titles especially.

For surance I did an littlle unsharp en resized , ending in this.
Don't know if it's any better so if necessary a prescreen would be appreciated

Better, and the lower resolution helps hide it as well.

Regarding this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8399091

Don't know which way to go with it as i could imagine it's too green, too purple, and also totally oversaturated or even too harsh contrast
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Oversaturated.. the clouds look quite pink/red.

[wkd001]

Hello

I've received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8393830 and i don't really agree on this one

Oversharpen, I can imagine, seeing some jaggies, but don't think it ain't that bad IMO.
Heat haze I don't understand ,as there is no haze affecting the main subject.
For surance I did an littlle unsharp en resized , ending in this.
Don't know if it's any better so if necessary a prescreen would be appreciated

Regarding this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8399091

Don't know which way to go with it as i could imagine it's too green, too purple, and also totally oversaturated or even too harsh contrast
So any guidance would be appreciated here.

Thanks in Advance

[wkd001]

1. borderline soft/contrast
2. very borderline contrast

Thanks alot about Dana,

I've tried my luck with an (in my eyes) improved version of the Korean 787-9.

Now I would like a prescreen of two photos.

The reason I'm uploading two photos from the same sequence here is the fact, that I think that the TK 787-9 is backlit as the Avianca Cargo is not in my eyes.
For both is the contrast difficult (caused by hazy sunlight) and i'm unsure about the sharpness (especially on the TK.

Thanks in Advance.

[dlowwa]

OK Thanks Dana,

I've queued an improved version of the EVA 787-10.

I would like a prescreen of these two photos.

Is this version of the KE 787 better in terms of contrast, or even worse? Had a little light and tried to stretch out the histogram as far as possible.
i also would like to know if the sharpness is enough,

I'm also worried about the contrast,exposure and sgharpness here.
Apologies for maybe annoying you, but I really want to figure this out properly.and it's still difficult for me.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

1. borderline soft/contrast
2. very borderline contrast

[wkd001]

Both a bit soft, and first almost certainly a contrast rejection. Second will be borderline.

OK Thanks Dana,

I've queued an improved version of the EVA 787-10.

I would like a prescreen of these two photos.

Is this version of the KE 787 better in terms of contrast, or even worse? Had a little light and tried to stretch out the histogram as far as possible.
i also would like to know if the sharpness is enough,

I'm also worried about the contrast,exposure and sgharpness here.
Apologies for maybe annoying you, but I really want to figure this out properly.and it's still difficult for me.

Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

OK Thanks I'll try my luck with it. If it fails so be it.

Now I would like a prescreen on these two photos.

Both taken with hazy sunlight ,so contrast will come into play. I also want to know if the glare on the Korean is not too disturbing. I'm also especially unsure of the exposure of both.
If there are other issues. I would like too know as well,

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards.

Both a bit soft, and first almost certainly a contrast rejection. Second will be borderline.

[wkd001]

Flat/dark, but it's not really a processing problem, more to do with the low light when shooting. As such, not sure you can 'fix' it much.

OK Thanks I'll try my luck with it. If it fails so be it.

Now I would like a prescreen on these two photos.

Both taken with hazy sunlight ,so contrast will come into play. I also want to know if the glare on the Korean is not too disturbing. I'm also especially unsure of the exposure of both.
If there are other issues. I would like too know as well,

Thanks in advance.

Best Regards.

[dlowwa]

Thanks a lot about that Dana,

Just one question now,

Is the contrast too soft or too low, maybe i can tweak something.

Thanks in advance.

Flat/dark, but it's not really a processing problem, more to do with the low light when shooting. As such, not sure you can 'fix' it much.

[wkd001]

Borderline soft/contrast.

Thanks a lot about that Dana,

Just one question now,

Is the contrast too soft or too low, maybe i can tweak something.

Thanks in advance.

[dlowwa]

I have another question.

Could someone pre-screen this one,

It was taken just after sunrise. I'm unsure about almost everything. Contrast, noise, sharpness, exposure, color, maybe even halos and dust spots.

if it's a no-go so be it.

Thanks in Advance.

Borderline soft/contrast.

[wkd001]

The rejection for colour is a bit harsh IMO. A wee bit of sharpening and it is good to go. You can quote me in your re-upload, if you want.

Thanks a lot about that Geri,

Opposite to my normal behaviour, I've done that this time in my re-upload for the (in my eyes) improved vesrion of this Easyjet.
It's noted in the comment to screeners box.

I have another question.

Could someone pre-screen this one,

It was taken just after sunrise. I'm unsure about almost everything. Contrast, noise, sharpness, exposure, color, maybe even halos and dust spots.

if it's a no-go so be it.

Thanks in Advance.

[LX-A343]

Thanks a lot again Dana,

I've brought modified versions in terms of sharpness to the queue

Yesterday I've received this reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8307210

I would like to receive some extra explanation about it.
Soft I could imagine as I see some soft areas , but hard lines are visible
Color I don't really understand, maybe a little too oversaturated (orange/green)

Thanks in advance for your time.

Best Regards.

The rejection for colour is a bit harsh IMO. A wee bit of sharpening and it is good to go. You can quote me in your re-upload, if you want.