Majky737 - Editing Advice

[dlowwa]

Today I have received a reject linked here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12174556

as previous edit was rejected for being undersharpened, I have added some sharpening. However, photo is rejected for undersharpening and blurry. I have reviewed the image, but I am not sure - are there any specific parts blurry/undersharpened or whole aircraft in general? I somehow can not identify it. Does it worth to add more sharpening or is it one for PC?

Thank you.

Can't tell for sure because of the resolution, but it's either a bit blurry, or extremely soft. The whole aircraft.

[Majky737]

Today I have received a reject linked here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12174556

as previous edit was rejected for being undersharpened, I have added some sharpening. However, photo is rejected for undersharpening and blurry. I have reviewed the image, but I am not sure - are there any specific parts blurry/undersharpened or whole aircraft in general? I somehow can not identify it. Does it worth to add more sharpening or is it one for PC?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I would like to ask for pre-screening of following image, as I had some problems to set contrast and sharpening and I am not fully sure it is ok.

Heat hazed and a bit dark.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I would like to ask for pre-screening of following image, as I had some problems to set contrast and sharpening and I am not fully sure it is ok.

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Ok thank you. I know it is hard to fix this issue, but before I pass this photo out, I wand to ask you for prescreening one last edit of it. If it still shows compression in sky, I will leave it.

Thank you for your time

Same issue persists.

[Majky737]

Sky is very noisy/blotchy.

Ok thank you. I know it is hard to fix this issue, but before I pass this photo out, I wand to ask you for prescreening one last edit of it. If it still shows compression in sky, I will leave it.

Thank you for your time

[dlowwa]

Thank you.

I have one more reject for JPEG compression, made a new edit, is it somehow better or still compression kills the photo?

Sky is very noisy/blotchy.

[Majky737]

Thank you.

I have one more reject for JPEG compression, made a new edit, is it somehow better or still compression kills the photo?

[dlowwa]

Hello,

As I have received following reject, I took another photo from batch and processed it. However, I am not fully sure if it is sharp and if heat disortion is there killing this photo. Can you prescreen it for me?

Soft/heat hazed.

[Majky737]

Hello,

As I have received following reject, I took another photo from batch and processed it. However, I am not fully sure if it is sharp and if heat disortion is there killing this photo. Can you prescreen it for me?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Thank you. I will fix the issue.

I have received one more reject here:


I have played with curves a little and I want to ask, if this version is somehow better:

If not, is there any chance to recommend how to process it in better way?

A touch soft, otherwise ok for me.

[Majky737]

Left side/tail area is a bit soft.

Thank you. I will fix the issue.

I have received one more reject here:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982257

I have played with curves a little and I want to ask, if this version is somehow better:


If not, is there any chance to recommend how to process it in better way?

Thank you

M.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I have some difficulieties to identify soft spots on this one:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982256

Can you help me? Is the whole aircraft soft or only specific parts?

Thank you.

Left side/tail area is a bit soft.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I have some difficulieties to identify soft spots on this one:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11982256

Can you help me? Is the whole aircraft soft or only specific parts?

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your help. I have added some extra sharpening (as well to my second rejected photo). New edits are attached below. Do you think they are sharp enough now?

Not sure the quality's really there on the first. Looks compressed/oversharpened/soft in various places.

Definitely not there in the second, I would give up on that one.