Majky737 - Editing Advice

[dlowwa]

If I send you original via PM, are you willing to check it?

Yes.

[Majky737]

Contrast is borderline, and sharpening is uneven (oversharpened towards the front, soft towards the tail). Not sure how easy it would be to fix without knowing the quality of the original.

If I send you original via PM, are you willing to check it?

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I have some difficulties to process photo of E190 attached later on this post.

It was firstly rejected for being undersharpened and wrong categories, after some adjustment it was rejected for being oversharpened and contrast.

As I like the livery, I have started again and now I want to ask for pre-screening, questions are especially

- is it sharp enougth (but not oversharpened)?
- is contrast sufficient or better to keed the photo for personal collection?

Thank you for your response, photo is attached below.

Contrast is borderline, and sharpening is uneven (oversharpened towards the front, soft towards the tail). Not sure how easy it would be to fix without knowing the quality of the original.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I have some difficulties to process photo of E190 attached later on this post.

It was firstly rejected for being undersharpened and wrong categories, after some adjustment it was rejected for being oversharpened and contrast.

As I like the livery, I have started again and now I want to ask for pre-screening, questions are especially

- is it sharp enougth (but not oversharpened)?
- is contrast sufficient or better to keed the photo for personal collection?

Thank you for your response, photo is attached below.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I am looking for some advice on attached photos. My main concerns are noise/undersharpening on first and contrast on second. Better to keep those for private collection?

1. soft/blurry. not fixable
2. soft, contrast. not fixable.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I am looking for some advice on attached photos. My main concerns are noise/undersharpening on first and contrast on second. Better to keep those for private collection?

Thank you for your time.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

today, I have received this reject for Soft and Contrast:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11325281

I have started again from original file. I have sharpened photo and as I think contrast was too strong, I have set it a little lower.

I want to ask for pre-screening, especially if the photo is sharp enought and if not, which area is soft. As I started from original, I am seeking for advice about horizont as well.

Still soft and poor contrast. Might not be fixable.

[Majky737]

Hello,

today, I have received this reject for Soft and Contrast:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11325281

I have started again from original file. I have sharpened photo and as I think contrast was too strong, I have set it a little lower.

I want to ask for pre-screening, especially if the photo is sharp enought and if not, which area is soft. As I started from original, I am seeking for advice about horizont as well.

Thank you for your time.

M.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo. My main concerns are about sharpening and if the photo is not backlit (as wings are in shadow).

Indeed a bit soft/blurry.

[Majky737]

Hello,

I want to ask for prescreening of attached photo. My main concerns are about sharpening and if the photo is not backlit (as wings are in shadow).

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Thank you. One more try to edit, still too dark?

Overall exposure seems to be ok, but light is quite harsh.

[Majky737]

Still pretty dark.

Thank you. One more try to edit, still too dark?

[dlowwa]

Hello,

today, I have received reject for being underexposed/dark: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11266664

Well, I made some adjustment resulting to attached photo:

However, I am not sure if I should upload this edit, as the shadow from wing is not very good. Do you think it is worth to adjust / upload this photo or does shadow on fuselage kill it's chances at all?

Still pretty dark.

[Majky737]

Hello,

today, I have received reject for being underexposed/dark: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11266664

Well, I made some adjustment resulting to attached photo:



However, I am not sure if I should upload this edit, as the shadow from wing is not very good. Do you think it is worth to adjust / upload this photo or does shadow on fuselage kill it's chances at all?

Thank you.
Marian

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I have took some pictures during my recent trip and I would like to know if some of them have chance to make it to DB.

1. - This was taken trought window. So my main concerns are if is window glare somehow visible or not? And should this be rejected for obstruction as one wing is hidden? If so, would tighter crop work?

2 - This was taken trought window, would be rejected for glare?

3 - this was taken trought window, would be rejected for glare? Maybe contrast, colors?

4 - Would this be rejected for obstruction? I have checked some other photos of this frame in DB, sometimes the float is hidden behind ponton, sometimes not, so hard to decide to me if I should give it a go or not.

1. horizon, borderline contrast
2-3. soft, borderline contrast
4. obstruction