nik-pilgrim - rejection help/editing advice

[dlowwa]

First one lacks contrast and it's a bit dark, also soft in the words in the plane body. The second is dark (see the right side of the histogram) and the third is dark (see the right side of the histogram), soft and needs CW rotation.

Best Regards,

Vinicius

Sorry, but contrast and exposure are not big issues with these images.

[dlowwa]

it would be desirable to hear opinion of community on these pictures before application for the publication

1. color (orange tint). contrast and exposure are ok.
2. centering and overprocessed. Whatever you're doing to pull the shadows like that usually results in a bad processing rejection. As a Night Shot, exposure is not an issue.
3. horizon, compression, and appears to be window reflection in top right corner

[vcruvinel]

and how to be if shooting is carried out at sunset?

Nik,

Even if the photo was taken at sunset, it does not mean it has to be dark. There is a gap in the right side from the histogram.



Better wait a comment from a screener...but hope this help.

Best Regards,

Vinicius

[nik-pilgrim]

and how to be if shooting is carried out at sunset?

[vcruvinel]

it would be desirable to hear opinion of community on these pictures before application for the publication
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14688[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14689[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]14690[/ATTACH]

First one lacks contrast and it's a bit dark, also soft in the words in the plane body. The second is dark (see the right side of the histogram) and the third is dark (see the right side of the histogram), soft and needs CW rotation.

Best Regards,

Vinicius

[nik-pilgrim]

it would be desirable to hear opinion of community on these pictures before application for the publication

[dlowwa]

all one, I can't understand that Bad information is meant criterion?

Gerardo has already told you: there was a blank space entered before the serial. The difference between this:

Registration: RF-92438

and this:

Registration:RF-92438

The former will cause and error in the database, and was thus rejected.

[nik-pilgrim]

all one, I can't understand that Bad information is meant criterion?

[LX-A343]

frankly speaking, I don't understand a remark concerning a bad informatsmm. Board number (registration) is specified, plane type too... Of course it is possible to argue with too big free space - not to cut off the picture directly on a plane contour... I will wait that the administrator of a formum will answer (he requested the reference to the decision)

As you want, but I think I have a very good knowledge of what's happening behind the screening scenes, being myself about 15 years screener here and senior screener, since the senior screeners have been introduced here at JP more than 10 years ago

[nik-pilgrim]

frankly speaking, I don't understand a remark concerning a bad informatsmm. Board number (registration) is specified, plane type too... Of course it is possible to argue with too big free space - not to cut off the picture directly on a plane contour... I will wait that the administrator of a formum will answer (he requested the reference to the decision)

[LX-A343]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6466682

there is a bit too much dead space around the aircraft. The screener left you a note regarding the bad info: you left a blank before the reg. This can cause problems with the db.

[nik-pilgrim]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6466682

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Can you please send us the link to that rejection ?

Thank you

Alex

[nik-pilgrim]

I don't understand a cause of failure in the publication of a photo again:
- Subject too far
- Too much dead space
- Bad Info
Especially point of refusal - Bad information isn't clear the aunt that it is meant it?

[nik-pilgrim]

thanks. I will try to remake and send anew