Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guillaume BACH Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guillaume BACH Editing advice

    Hello,
    I don't understand those rejections

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6476549
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=6476552

    And would like to have some help considering the following picture. Can someone prescreen them please.

    Thanks for the help.

  • #2
    Hi.

    The Dark Tones lacking in both images. With a small adjustment in the levels, this issue should be gone.
    But i would add Soft to the Japan Air, as expecially the Titles seems to be soft.

    And would like to have some help considering the following picture. Can someone prescreen them please.
    Attachment 14811Attachment 14810Attachment 14812Attachment 14813Attachment 14814
    Thanks for the help.
    Unfortunately i can´t open those images. Can you please attach them again?
    Best Regards from Germany,
    Julian S.​

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you, and here they are.

      A-916.pdf
      B-HRN.pdf
      HB-JBA.pdf
      JA16KZ.pdf

      Guillaume BACH
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
        Thank you, and here they are.

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14816[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14817[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14818[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]14819[/ATTACH]

        Guillaume BACH
        As I can see from the thumbnails, they are PDF, which you can't upload and all portrait mode instead of landscape. Please show the JPG files you want to upload.
        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

        Comment


        • #5
          Better now?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	9V-SVK .jpg
Views:	1
Size:	431.7 KB
ID:	1023223
          Click image for larger version

Name:	A-916 .jpg
Views:	2
Size:	770.4 KB
ID:	1023224
          Click image for larger version

Name:	B-HRN .jpg
Views:	1
Size:	455.3 KB
ID:	1023225
          Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JBA .jpg
Views:	1
Size:	381.4 KB
ID:	1023226
          Click image for larger version

Name:	JA16KZ.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	316.3 KB
ID:	1023227

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
            Better now?
            Yes.

            1. soft/heat haze
            2. color, contrast, backlit
            3. soft
            4. soft, contrast, backlit
            5. overprocessed (editing halos), soft

            Comment


            • #7
              Thanks a lot.

              Comment


              • #8
                Editing Advice

                Hello,
                Could I have feedback on these shots please.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-ZRX.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	595.9 KB
ID:	1027695Click image for larger version

Name:	JY-RFA.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1027696Click image for larger version

Name:	a-929 - copie.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	583.1 KB
ID:	1027697Click image for larger version

Name:	113-FL.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	456.3 KB
ID:	1027698Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-RAI.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	647.1 KB
ID:	1027699
                Thanks

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
                  Hello,
                  Could I have feedback on these shots please.
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]15391[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15392[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15393[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15394[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15395[/ATTACH]
                  Thanks
                  All of them appears to be soft.

                  #1, #4 and #5 also dark, and #2 blurry (wings)

                  Better wait comment from the screeners but hope this helps.

                  Best,

                  Vinicius

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Thanks a lot

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
                      Hello,
                      Could I have feedback on these shots please.
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15391[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15392[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15393[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15394[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15395[/ATTACH]
                      Thanks
                      1. noisy, soft, dark
                      2. soft/blurry
                      3. borderline contrast
                      4. noisy, soft, dark, contrast
                      5. too far, soft, contrast

                      2, 3, and 5 might be fixable, especially if you try at a lower resolution like 1200, which will be better to mask the flaws in the images.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ok I will try to correct them a bit,
                        Thanks a lot

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hello,

                          I recently got this rejection and I don't understand why the first airplane is considered as "Foreground Clutter"
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7298355

                          I also wanted to know if the issue with the following rejection has been corrected (see attachment)
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277763

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	LX-VCL.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	686.4 KB
ID:	1035308


                          Finally, I would like to know if the Air New Zeland 777 and the Qantas 330 shots are suitable to be accepted.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	ZK-oKO.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	743.6 KB
ID:	1035309

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-QPJ.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	763.7 KB
ID:	1035310

                          Thanks for your help and your time

                          Best regards

                          Guillaume

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
                            Hello,

                            I recently got this rejection and I don't understand why the first airplane is considered as "Foreground Clutter"
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7298355
                            As in the wording of the rejection, the clutter in the foreground is too distracting.

                            Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
                            I also wanted to know if the issue with the following rejection has been corrected (see attachment)
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277763

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24682[/ATTACH]
                            I see little to no difference between the two, and furthermore, I'd also have considered that a soft and perhaps noisy rejection as well.

                            Originally posted by Guillaume BACH View Post
                            Finally, I would like to know if the Air New Zeland 777 and the Qantas 330 shots are suitable to be accepted.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24683[/ATTACH]

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24684[/ATTACH]
                            Both images are quite soft, and the first also unlevel.

                            Unfortunately, your images don't quite have the quality for 1600pix, perhaps you might try adding a little sharpening and submitting them at 1280pix instead.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Thanks a lot for your help I will work on those, I will do my best.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X