john1024 - prescreening request / editing advice

[john1024]

Dear JP Forum

I got rejection (multiple) due to nois. Had that issue not often before. All my pictuers are with ISO 100, and I do only minor adjustments (Kurves).
Why is that for example here a problem with noise? What do I have to adjust? I do realy not understand the issue and the nois argument.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9617866

Thanks in advance for helping me and explain the reason.

John

[dlowwa]

Dear JP Forum

I got rejection (multiple) due to nois. Had that issue not often before. All my pictuers are with ISO 100, and I do only minor adjustments (Kurves).
Why is that for example here a problem with noise? What do I have to adjust? I do realy not understand the issue and the nois argument.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9617866

Thanks in advance for helping me and explain the reason.

John

Image has already been appealed. As such, there will be no further comments from crew.

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/digital-photo-processing-forum/63048-suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

"..if you get a rejection you don't agree with, better to come here and get advice before appealing, not after."

[john1024]

Image has already been appealed. As such, there will be no further comments from crew.

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/digital-photo-processing-forum/63048-suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

"..if you get a rejection you don't agree with, better to come here and get advice before appealing, not after."

Apologise for that, will remember. Thanks

[john1024]

Dear JP Community
I do stuck often with showing a detail, meaning cut of some part. I already asked in the forum, but it seems there is no exact answer.
That's why I turn to you again, asking following example:
For that one I got rejection:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9730775

following was accepted:

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10413525

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10388105

Why is the british airways not ok, the others are? What do I have to pay attention? I do really struggle with that type of format.

thanks in advance, have also a good time.

john

[dlowwa]

Dear JP Community
I do stuck often with showing a detail, meaning cut of some part. I already asked in the forum, but it seems there is no exact answer.
That's why I turn to you again, asking following example:
For that one I got rejection:

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9730775

following was accepted:

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10413525

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10388105

Why is the british airways not ok, the others are? What do I have to pay attention? I do really struggle with that type of format.

thanks in advance, have also a good time.

john

Awkward crop on the left, part of the wing remains in the frame. The others are borderline as well, but would have been acceptable to me too.

[john1024]

Dear Forum

Again I would like to ask you about cropping picture: Would following be fine?


Thanks in advance, John.

[dlowwa]

Dear Forum

Again I would like to ask you about cropping picture: Would following be fine?

Don't think so. Quality also quite poor.

[john1024]

Thanks dlowwa for the reply.

What do you mean with the 'Quality also quite poor'?

Sharpness, contrast? What have to be done to get accepted? Any chance to fix it?

thanks in advance for your help.

john.

[dlowwa]

Thanks dlowwa for the reply.

What do you mean with the 'Quality also quite poor'?

Sharpness, contrast? What have to be done to get accepted? Any chance to fix it?

Soft/blurry and very noisy. Not fixable, at that resolution anyway.

[john1024]

dear JP Forum
Again I like to ask you about rejection reason due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. What is the matter, or what did I wrong to get that rejection. I normally do only a bit of contrast, checking the highlights and darks and a bit of sharpening. Often there are other reasons that lead to a rejection and you are all the time right, but here I do not understand what is meant by that rejection.
Thanks in advance for all the great help and your work.

John

[dlowwa]

dear JP Forum
Again I like to ask you about rejection reason due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. What is the matter, or what did I wrong to get that rejection. I normally do only a bit of contrast, checking the highlights and darks and a bit of sharpening. Often there are other reasons that lead to a rejection and you are all the time right, but here I do not understand what is meant by that rejection.
Thanks in advance for all the great help and your work.

John

Screener comments on the rejection: visible banding on clouds

Looks more like noise to me, but that's how it was classified by the screeners who rejected it.

[john1024]

Details of aircraft:
Dear forum:
I already asked about the rules for detail-shots (part of the plane cut off).

I got two accepted, with a crop behind the wing on the fuselage. My last submission was rejected.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10224613
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10388105


So my question: What is a (or the) rule of getting accepted by cropping the plane?

Thanks in advance.

[dlowwa]

Details of aircraft:
Dear forum:
I already asked about the rules for detail-shots (part of the plane cut off).

I got two accepted, with a crop behind the wing on the fuselage. My last submission was rejected.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10224613
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10388105

So my question: What is a (or the) rule of getting accepted by cropping the plane?

No rule, just subjective personal preferences (unfortunately for you). It would probably help if the rejected image were a little bit less of a side-on, and more of a 3/4 rear shot.

[john1024]

Dear Forum
Unfortunately I'm not able to figure out the registration of following Delta Connection CRJ. does anyone anderstood how to read or find the registration?
thanks in advance, John.

[thebigdog360]

After doing research on the tail number, I figure this is N601LR. You could check flight history to verify if this aircraft was at your airport when you took the photo. But this is also the digital processing forum, so questions like this should be somewhere else.