My apologies. I'm still new around here...
Any thoughts on the images?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Prescreening request - Ben Long
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ben Long View PostHi all,
I've found a few more photos from Europe and would love your opinion on whether they would get accepted!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22849[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22850[/ATTACH]
I've tried my best to keep them at Jetphotos-standards, but if there are any issues that may result in a rejection I'd love to know to improve my editing style!
Cheers,
Ben Long
Leave a comment:
-
Pre-screening request
Hi all,
I've found a few more photos from Europe and would love your opinion on whether they would get accepted!
I've tried my best to keep them at Jetphotos-standards, but if there are any issues that may result in a rejection I'd love to know to improve my editing style!
Cheers,
Ben Long
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben Long View PostThanks for that.
I've attached the "corrected" version of images 2 and 5, would love to know if they would get accepted. Cheers! [ATTACH=CONFIG]22844[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]22845[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post1, 3, 4: look OK
2 looks slightly leaning to the right, judging by the post in the background
5 is a wee bit soft and lacks a wee bit contrast
I've attached the "corrected" version of images 2 and 5, would love to know if they would get accepted. Cheers!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben Long View PostHi all,
I've collated some of my photos from my travels over the years (Frankfurt, Zurich, Berlin, etc), re-edited them and was looking to try and get some of them on JP.
If I could have your thoughts on whether they will be successful, that would be awesome!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22810[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22811[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22812[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22813[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]22814[/ATTACH]
Cheers,
Ben Long
2 looks slightly leaning to the right, judging by the post in the background
5 is a wee bit soft and lacks a wee bit contrast
Leave a comment:
-
Prescreening request - Ben Long
Hi all,
I've collated some of my photos from my travels over the years (Frankfurt, Zurich, Berlin, etc), re-edited them and was looking to try and get some of them on JP.
If I could have your thoughts on whether they will be successful, that would be awesome!
Cheers,
Ben Long
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben Long View PostHi all,
Attached is an image that has twice been rejected for being "dark/underexposed"
The most recent time it was rejected the screener suggested that I added more highlights.
I have tried to properly expose/brighten the image and have attached it below. Do you think it will be accepted, if not what are some possible rejection reasons?
I do want to try and get this image accepted as it is my final queue slot and my last photo until I get 20 queue slots (it will be my 10th shot on the db).
Thank you.
Regards,
Ben Long
Leave a comment:
-
Pre-screening request
Hi all,
Attached is an image that has twice been rejected for being "dark/underexposed"
The most recent time it was rejected the screener suggested that I added more highlights.
I have tried to properly expose/brighten the image and have attached it below. Do you think it will be accepted, if not what are some possible rejection reasons?
I do want to try and get this image accepted as it is my final queue slot and my last photo until I get 20 queue slots (it will be my 10th shot on the db).
Thank you.
Regards,
Ben Long
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben Long View PostHi all,
So I've been having trouble with a photo lately.
First of all I'll start of by asking if anyone knows why a L-39 doesn't count as "warbird/vintage". The aircraft's production started before 1970 and the aircraft that I was uploading is an ex-military aircraft now under a civilian registration. These are both criteria that an aircraft needs to meet to be Warbird/Vintage. However my most recent upload of this photo was rejected for being put in this category. It makes no sense to me but I'm sure some one can help explain it to me as I'm rather confused
Anyhow, I've uploaded this image twice now and has both times been rejected for being "dark/underexposed"
On the most recent upload attempt the screener stated that the shot needed more highlights, thus I have adjusted the histogram to show that.
I would love to know if any of the screeners on here would believe that this shot (most recent edit after rejections) will be accepted. I don't want to mess this one up as it's a new rego and my final queue slot (I have 9 photos accepted on the db so I'm hoping to get to 10 to get 20 upload slots).
Image attached below.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22677[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Prescreening request - Ben Long
Hi all,
So I've been having trouble with a photo lately.
First of all I'll start of by asking if anyone knows why a L-39 doesn't count as "warbird/vintage". The aircraft's production started before 1970 and the aircraft that I was uploading is an ex-military aircraft now under a civilian registration. These are both criteria that an aircraft needs to meet to be Warbird/Vintage. However my most recent upload of this photo was rejected for being put in this category. It makes no sense to me but I'm sure some one can help explain it to me as I'm rather confused
Anyhow, I've uploaded this image twice now and has both times been rejected for being "dark/underexposed"
On the most recent upload attempt the screener stated that the shot needed more highlights, thus I have adjusted the histogram to show that.
I would love to know if any of the screeners on here would believe that this shot (most recent edit after rejections) will be accepted. I don't want to mess this one up as it's a new rego and my final queue slot (I have 9 photos accepted on the db so I'm hoping to get to 10 to get 20 upload slots).
Image attached below.
Tags: None
Leave a comment: