Reuben Morison - Prescreening/editing advice

[dlowwa]

This was the final ever landing of the NZ 777-200ER fleet on NZ soil, with this less than ideal lighting would this be acceptable?

Very likely a contrast rejection.

[NZDN_spotting]

This was the final ever landing of the NZ 777-200ER fleet on NZ soil, with this less than ideal lighting would this be acceptable?

[NZDN_spotting]

This aircraft, VH-REH was rejected for aircraft, with the screeners saying it should be WSK-Mielec SB Lim-2 and is already in the database as such. There are no photos of this reg or serial in the JP database. The Polish Air Force who this was imported from operated the Lim-2 built by both PZL and WSK. The other one in Bathurst was a WSK one, while this one was a PZL one. The appeal was rejected with the screener saying it was already in database as WSK, when it is not.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8331491

[NZDN_spotting]

Technically yes, but it will be at the screener's discretion whether the change is visible enough.



Borderline for contrast. Crop/centering also a bit awkward.

I got lucky, Te Rangi Nui had also added the ZK- to the painted registration

[dlowwa]

Would the Te Rangi Nui ltd titles on the tail classify this one as hot? Was previously private

Technically yes, but it will be at the screener's discretion whether the change is visible enough.

Would this be acceptable or a contrast rejection?

Borderline for contrast. Crop/centering also a bit awkward.

[NZDN_spotting]

Would the Te Rangi Nui ltd titles on the tail classify this one as hot? Was previously privateWould this be acceptable or a contrast rejection?

[dlowwa]

Mostly concerned about contrast on these ones, and the left wing obstruction in the Sakota

Doesn't look like there is much that could have done to improve these, so would be ok for me.

[NZDN_spotting]

Mostly concerned about contrast on these ones, and the left wing obstruction in the Sakota

[dlowwa]

Would this be rejected for obstructed?

No.

[NZDN_spotting]

Would this be rejected for obstructed?

[NZDN_spotting]

first has a contrast problem, a/c is not well lit, second is borderline for contrast also some parts look a tad soft,third looks acceptable

First two have been accepted, I put them in the queue today and accepted, I thought the third was borderline soft.

[NZDN_spotting]

for me that would be a cut off rejection

Yeah, thought so. It would be obstructed if I cropped it wider.

[pdeboer]

And this one too [ATTACH=CONFIG]29578[/ATTACH]

for me that would be a cut off rejection

[pdeboer]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29575[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29576[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29577[/ATTACH]
Feedback on these 3 please

first has a contrast problem, a/c is not well lit, second is borderline for contrast also some parts look a tad soft,third looks acceptable

[NZDN_spotting]

And this one too