Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Air France 447 - On topic only!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Harding View Post
    I'd really feel safe flying with Evan & Gabriel at the controls.
    I wouldn't.

    --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
    --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

    Comment


    • Not being technical, I suppose the following did not seem as interesting to some as it did to me.
      Meanwhile, it will soon be decided whether Pierre-Henri Gourgeon, the CEO of Air France-KLM, will have his contract extended. When the company held a press conference to announce its annual report in Paris last week, Gourgeon was asked whether he thought the investigators' report might complicate his reappointment.

      The trained fighter pilot sidestepped the sensitive matter saying: "I don't really like the word 'responsibility' so much."
      http://www.spiegel.de/international/...764227,00.html

      Comment


      • FDR and CVR data will be released next friday.


        Reuters) – Preliminary findings from the recorders of an Air France jet that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009 have found that the pilots became distracted with malfunctioning airspeed indicators and failed to properly manage other critical systems, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The crew did not follow standard procedures to maintain air speed and keep the aircraft's nose level after the Airbus 330 encountered some turbulence and unexpectedly high icing at 35,000 feet, the paper said.
        Air France and Airbus were unavailable for comment outside business hours.
        The Journal said the cockpit recorders show that the pilots apparently became confused by the alarms blaring from their instruments and despite trying to systematically respond to each warning, were unable to sort out the chaos and maintain a steady course.
        The findings from the recorders, which are to be released on Friday, are expected to show that the twin-engine jet slowed dangerously after the autopilot disengaged.
        The crash killed all 228 people on board Flight 447, which was on a scheduled flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.
        A Former Airdisaster.Com Forum (senior member)....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Black Ram View Post
          Highkeas and Theoddkiwi will take care of the maintenance. Myndee can take pictures.
          Only until I graduate from A&P school. That will be at the end of August, 2013. Black Ram can take pictures of me graduating at the top of my class.
          I do work for a domestic US airline, and it should be noted that I do not represent such airline, or any airline. My opinions are mine alone, and aren't reflective of anything but my own knowledge, or what I am trying to learn. At no time will I discuss my specific airline, internal policies, or any such info.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by AVION1 View Post
            FDR and CVR data will be released next friday.


            Reuters) – Preliminary findings from the recorders of an Air France jet that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009 have found that the pilots became distracted with malfunctioning airspeed indicators and failed to properly manage other critical systems, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The crew did not follow standard procedures to maintain air speed and keep the aircraft's nose level after the Airbus 330 encountered some turbulence and unexpectedly high icing at 35,000 feet, the paper said.
            Air France and Airbus were unavailable for comment outside business hours.
            The Journal said the cockpit recorders show that the pilots apparently became confused by the alarms blaring from their instruments and despite trying to systematically respond to each warning, were unable to sort out the chaos and maintain a steady course.
            The findings from the recorders, which are to be released on Friday, are expected to show that the twin-engine jet slowed dangerously after the autopilot disengaged.
            The crash killed all 228 people on board Flight 447, which was on a scheduled flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.
            Looks like I am not quite so effing stupid after all.
            Sadly we all seem to have agreed on this a while back, if it is in fact true. Wait, my opinions and conclusions are invalid because I don't have testicles.
            I do work for a domestic US airline, and it should be noted that I do not represent such airline, or any airline. My opinions are mine alone, and aren't reflective of anything but my own knowledge, or what I am trying to learn. At no time will I discuss my specific airline, internal policies, or any such info.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Harding View Post
              I'd really feel safe flying with Evan & Gabriel at the controls.
              /Spectator since june 2 -2009.
              What position would you give to ATFS-Crash?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by AVION1 View Post
                FDR and CVR data will be released next friday.


                Reuters) – Preliminary findings from the recorders of an Air France jet that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009 have found that the pilots became distracted with malfunctioning airspeed indicators and failed to properly manage other critical systems, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The crew did not follow standard procedures to maintain air speed and keep the aircraft's nose level after the Airbus 330 encountered some turbulence and unexpectedly high icing at 35,000 feet, the paper said.
                Air France and Airbus were unavailable for comment outside business hours.
                The Journal said the cockpit recorders show that the pilots apparently became confused by the alarms blaring from their instruments and despite trying to systematically respond to each warning, were unable to sort out the chaos and maintain a steady course.
                The findings from the recorders, which are to be released on Friday, are expected to show that the twin-engine jet slowed dangerously after the autopilot disengaged.
                The crash killed all 228 people on board Flight 447, which was on a scheduled flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris.
                There are five reasons I can see for this to happen:

                1) The A/THR was slowing the a/c to turbulence penetration speed when it disengaged and the thrust levers were never moved out of the CL detent.

                2) There was some degree of engine performance reduction from ice crystal ingestion.

                3) The pilots manually set an airspeed significantly below CL.

                4) The pilots manually introduced excessive pitch to maintain FL or let pitch become excessive due to inattention.

                5) High altitude updrafts.

                IF the WSJ report is true, right now my money is on #1 with possible exacerbating factors of #4, #2 and #5.

                Comment


                • F the WSJ report is true, right now my money is on #1 with possible exacerbating factors of #4, #2 and #5.
                  I don't know about #2, judging by the leaks/reports/rumors. If engine performance issues were involved, it is more likely it would have been stressed in those leaks, maybe even exaggerated to "engines fail Air France crew". The tone in the leaks so far doesn't suggest engine issues to me. However, it is a compelling cause.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Myndee View Post
                    Only until I graduate from A&P school. That will be at the end of August, 2013. Black Ram can take pictures of me graduating at the top of my class.
                    Myndee, I'm very glad you no longer will be a wannabe a&p person.

                    Originally posted by Myndee View Post
                    Looks like I am not quite so effing stupid after all.
                    Sadly we all seem to have agreed on this a while back, if it is in fact true. Wait, my opinions and conclusions are invalid because I don't have testicles.
                    The article seems to confirm our main theory about the accident, which I would believe you weren't buying for some time, maybe until John Cox explained it
                    I don't see what it has to do with stupid or not stupid. Just to set the record straight, I'm not calling you stupid.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by SYDCBRWOD View Post
                      What position would you give to ATFS-Crash?
                      Probably some sort of entertainer in a airport bar!
                      Sorry for OT.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Myndee View Post
                        I don't have testicles.
                        Why not? Surely you can get some.

                        --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                        --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Evan View Post
                          4) The pilots manually introduced excessive pitch to maintain FL or let pitch become excessive due to inattention.
                          You and I know that they didn't have to introduce excessive pitch command, or any pitch command at all, to maintain FL even in the scenario of a slowing plane (for example due to 1). Inattention? Probably, but it's hard to pay attention to a dozen of things at the same time. Now you'll say that, among that dozen, attitude (and thrust) management should have been priority 1. I'll agree.

                          About not following the prescribed procedures for unreliable airspeed, I'm not surprised. Why would they when other dozen of crews didn't?

                          --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                          --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                          Comment


                          • Why wait till Friday?

                            Evan, you'll love this:

                            Originally posted by WSJ

                            Black Boxes Point to Pilot Error

                            The pilots of an Air France jet that crashed into the Atlantic Ocean two years ago apparently became distracted with faulty airspeed indicators and failed to properly deal with other vital systems, including adjusting engine thrust, according to people familiar with preliminary findings from the plane's recorders.

                            The final moments inside the cockpit of the twin-engine Airbus A330, these people said, indicate the pilots seemingly were confused by alarms they received from various automated flight-control systems as the plane passed through some turbulence typical on the route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris. They also faced unexpectedly heavy icing at 35,000 feet. Such icing is renowned for making airspeed-indicators and other external sensors unreliable.

                            Ultimately, despite the fact that primary cockpit displays functioned normally, the crew failed to follow standard procedures to maintain or increase thrust and keep the aircraft's nose level, while trouble-shooting and waiting for the airspeed sensors and related functions to return to normal, according to these people.

                            Slated to be disclosed by investigators on Friday, the sequence of events captured on the recorders is expected to highlight that the jet slowed dangerously shortly after the autopilot disconnected. The pilots almost immediately faced the beginning of what became a series of automation failures or disconnects related to problems with the plane's airspeed sensors, these people said.

                            The crew methodically tried to respond to the warnings, according to people familiar with the probe, but apparently had difficulty sorting out the warning messages, chimes and other cues while also keeping close track of essential displays showing engine power and aircraft trajectory.

                            Spokesmen for Air France, a unit of Air France-KLM, and Airbus, a unit of European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co., have declined to comment on any details of the investigation. Airbus last week, however, issued a bulletin reassuring airlines that the preliminary readout of the recorders hasn't prompted any "immediate recommendation" regarding the safety of the global A330 fleet. French investigators, who gave the green light for that statement, also have said their preliminary findings don't highlight any major system failures or malfunctions that could have caused the fatal dive.

                            The Air France pilots were never trained to handle precisely such an emergency, according to safety experts and a previous report by France's Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses, which is heading up the investigation. All 228 people aboard Flight 447 died in the accident.

                            The senior captain, Marc Dubois, appears to have been on a routine rest break in the cabin when the fatal chain of events started, according to safety experts familiar with the details, but the cockpit-voice recorder suggests he may have rushed back to the cockpit to join the other two Flight 447 pilots.

                            Though Friday's announcement won't provide final conclusions or specific causes, investigators believe Air France didn't train its pilots to cope with such automation problems in conjunction with a high-altitude aerodynamic stall, an emergency when the wings lose lift and the plane quickly becomes uncontrollable. Since the crash, Airbus and a number carriers, including Air France, have emphasized such training.

                            According to a report issued by French investigators in November 2009, Airbus identified 32 instances involving similar model jetliners between 2003 and 2009 in which external speed probes, known as pitot tubes, suffered ice buildup at high altitude and caused "erroneous air speed indications." Over the years, the same models also suffered numerous failures of external temperature-sensors because of icing. Both issues were known to Air France.

                            Most of the incidents with speed sensors involved probes similar to those on the A330 that crashed. Many were on Air France planes, according to the BEA report.

                            Friday's update follows sniping between senior officials of Air France and Airbus, usually close corporate allies, who in this case have tried to shift the blame for the accident to each other.

                            Air France began addressing problems with its pitot tubes almost a year before the crash. Amid several incidents in which air crews lost speed indication at high altitude during 2008, Air France reported the icing problems to Airbus. The two companies discussed solutions and Airbus talked to its supplier.

                            In April 2009, roughly 45 days before the crash, Airbus proposed that Air France swap out its pitot tubes for a different model believed to be less prone to icing, according to the BEA report. Air France began the work on April 27, 2009, and it received the first batch of new pitot tubes six days before the crash. The plane that crashed hadn't yet received the new equipment.

                            According to the 2009 report published by investigators after the crash, experts examined 13 other incidents of airspeed-sensor malfunctions on Airbus widebody jets at cruise altitudes. During most of those global incidents—none of which resulted in a crash—both the autopilots and automated engine-thrust systems disconnected on their own, and it took many of the flight crews up to a minute to manually adjust engine thrust.

                            The earlier report found that pilots in nine of those 13 events received warnings of an impending stall. And in a finding that may have particular relevance to the upcoming update, accident investigators in 2009 also concluded that when airspeed-sensor malfunctions kick off automated thrust controls, "the absence of appropriate manual adjustments" to engines "can present a risk" of a mismatch between power settings and the jet's orientation in the air.

                            Investigators began focusing on pitot problems from the start, because Flight 447's automated maintenance system broadcast 21 separate messages related to such malfunctions during roughly the last four minutes of the fatal flight. But the final report, which may not be released until 2012, also is expected to delve deeper into how European air-safety regulators dealt with persistent reports of pitot-tube icing prior to the crash.

                            The previous interim report indicated that in late March 2009, less than three months before the crash, European aviation regulators decided that the string of pitot-icing problems on widebody Airbus models wasn't serious enough to require mandatory replacement of pitot tubes.

                            --- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
                            --- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
                              Why wait till Friday?
                              Because the press is not what is used to be.

                              Evan, you'll love this:

                              The Air France pilots were never trained to handle precisely such an emergency, according to safety experts and a previous report by France's Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses, which is heading up the investigation.
                              That would explain it.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Gabriel View Post
                                Now you'll say that, among that dozen, attitude (and thrust) management should have been priority 1. I'll agree.
                                We agree then. The PF should stabilize the a/c before doing ANYTHING else. The PNF is there for a reason. Whatever happened to CRM?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X