Originally posted by 3WE
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Polish President and wife killed in Tu-154 crash
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Peter Kesternich View PostIt's not a matter of sidetracking the conversation. Everybody knows that it is possible to induce fog, given the right atmospheric conditions. But with all the elaborate planning that would have gone into bringing the plane down, it was still impossible to create these atmospheric conditions for the arrival window of the flight. So, it would all together have been possible to plan the crash and the plane would have arrived under clear skies with visibility of 100km, doing a visual approach and there was nothing anybody could have done about it, no matter what electronic and ATC distraction from the ground they had planned.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostI have one question for you. In most CFITs are the pilots aware at all times during the last phase of the flight how far they are from the ground, almost to a single foot?
Perhaps you will now attack my assertation- but it doesn't change the fact that this is not the first time someone busted minimums (and busted them grossly) and hit the ground (especially with someone "powerful" on board possibly exerting pressure to get there at all costs.)Les rčgles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostI would not be surprised if during April in Smolensk almost every day would have right atmospheric conditions, given some help. But look at this statistical information. It is startling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter Kesternich View PostSo, now you are telling us that the Russians also made the weather fit their conspiracy plans? Wouldn't it have been easier to create some kind of scandal to force the Polish president to resign, if they wanted to get rid of him in politics (which I doubt they wanted in the first place, because he just wasn't that important)?Les rčgles de l'aviation de base découragent de longues périodes de dur tirer vers le haut.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostLOL, the fog did not work so you come up with WHAT!? dynamite? yeah, right...
Everybody knows it was TNT.
--- Judge what is said by the merits of what is said, not by the credentials of who said it. ---
--- Defend what you say with arguments, not by imposing your credentials ---
Comment
-
An interesting perspective from a paraglider who tried to follow the approach path. You can watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeUEsA7NUUUздесь не стабилизированое видеоэто то чти видели бы лётчики в отсутствии тумана тока скорость полёта на 50км\ч мень...
If in fact the plane was flying at about 5m above ground and clipped the birch (red outline of the plane), then it would have had to also clip the tall trees directly behind the birch. But the trees are untouched. So either the plane was flying higher and it could not have clipped the birch, or, if in fact it was flying low, it had to be flying more to the right (blue outline) in order to miss the tall trees and then it would have also missed the birch. Either way impossible to reconcile with the official reports.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter Kesternich View PostSo, now you are telling us that the Russians also made the weather fit their conspiracy plans? Wouldn't it have been easier to create some kind of scandal to force the Polish president to resign, if they wanted to get rid of him in politics (which I doubt they wanted in the first place, because he just wasn't that important)?
I will post the English version when it is available.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter Kesternich View PostWhat makes you think that their witnesses are any more trustworthy than the rest of those people who produce a website like that?
This is interesting too:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Northwester View PostBecause they are local Russian people that don't have any interest in not telling the truth.
Comment
Comment