Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ms spot- prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ms spot
    replied
    Hi,
    would you also please take a look at these photos?
    Are they acceptable, if not, why would they be rejected?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_21neww16.JPG
Views:	156
Size:	395.2 KB
ID:	1104837Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_19newl08.JPG
Views:	151
Size:	386.3 KB
ID:	1104838
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hi,
    unfortubately my photo (the white one) was rejected for horizon unlevel and contrast.
    Do you agree with these rejection reasons or should I try to appeal or reedit the picture.
    Thank you, ms

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    One last request:
    I have tried to edit picture one from my earlier post in the same way.
    Does the image have a higher chance of acceptance now?
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_23nwe35..jpg Views:	0 Size:	561.0 KB ID:	1104538
    Thanks!
    Would be rejected for soft/blurry, and contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    One last request:
    I have tried to edit picture one from my earlier post in the same way.
    Does the image have a higher chance of acceptance now?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_23nwe35..jpg Views:	0 Size:	561.0 KB ID:	1104538
    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Thank you!
    If everything apart from the contrast is ok, I'll try it...

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hi,

    Thanks a lot for the advice, I think I can see what you mean...
    It is unfortunately nearly impossible to crop the image so that the bright spot is away and having a ratio of 16:9
    In spite of that, I have tried it with a similar picture:
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_22best38.JPG Views:	0 Size:	536.7 KB ID:	1104470
    I have reduced the spot with a different frame, but I do not entirely know if it's significantly better...

    I also had another idea: Why not using the RAW- picture and trying to edit it?
    I have not worked with RAW-Pictures so far as I thought it would be very difficult. However, after having watched some videos, this is my final result:
    I am not sure if it's better but in my opinion the image is brighter and the spot is less visible.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2238-2.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	560.8 KB
ID:	1104473
    Maybe it is better to work with this one...

    What do you think about this "new" versions?
    Which improvements can be still done?

    Thank you for taking your time!
    Best regards, ms
    Both still poor contrast, though you would have a better chance with the second one. If it were me, I wouldn't bother, but the worst that will happen if you try and submit that one is a rejection, so..

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hi,

    Thanks a lot for the advice, I think I can see what you mean...
    It is unfortunately nearly impossible to crop the image so that the bright spot is away and having a ratio of 16:9
    In spite of that, I have tried it with a similar picture:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_22best38.JPG Views:	0 Size:	536.7 KB ID:	1104470
    I have reduced the spot with a different frame, but I do not entirely know if it's significantly better...

    I also had another idea: Why not using the RAW- picture and trying to edit it?
    I have not worked with RAW-Pictures so far as I thought it would be very difficult. However, after having watched some videos, this is my final result:
    I am not sure if it's better but in my opinion the image is brighter and the spot is less visible.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2238-2.jpg
Views:	154
Size:	560.8 KB
ID:	1104473
    Maybe it is better to work with this one...

    What do you think about this "new" versions?
    Which improvements can be still done?

    Thank you for taking your time!
    Best regards, ms

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Thanks for the advice!

    The first two are not fixable, right?
    Most likely not.

    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    I have re-edited a similar image to the one I posted before:
    Which version is better?
    This one is a bit worse. The only way you'll get it to work is if you have a frame where there is no bright spot in the sky. The image overall needs brightening, which simply can't be done if part of the sky is already blown out.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Thanks for the advice!

    The first two are not fixable, right?

    I have re-edited a similar image to the one I posted before:
    Which version is better?
    On what should I improve in order to make it acceptable?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_22new39.JPG Views:	0 Size:	516.4 KB ID:	1104408
    It's an important picture for me so I'll try to fix this though I'm not the best at editing.
    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Hi,
    Today I went out planespotting in SZG because of some special visitors.
    Would you please prescreen the following pictures:

    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_22new87.JPG Views:	0 Size:	534.8 KB ID:	1104383Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_23new35.JPG Views:	0 Size:	554.9 KB ID:	1104384 Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_22new40.JPG Views:	0 Size:	531.3 KB ID:	1104386
    Thank you
    Poor light on all of these. #3 has cropping issues as well, but might be fixable with a better edit/different frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Hi,
    Today I went out planespotting in SZG because of some special visitors.
    Would you please prescreen the following pictures:

    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_22new87.JPG Views:	0 Size:	534.8 KB ID:	1104383Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_23new35.JPG Views:	0 Size:	554.9 KB ID:	1104384 Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_22new40.JPG Views:	0 Size:	531.3 KB ID:	1104386
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Thanks,
    What do you think about the following picture:
    Is it fixable?
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_21new93.JPG Views:	0 Size:	501.3 KB ID:	1104310
    Regards
    no chance: backlit, too dark and blurry

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Thanks,
    What do you think about the following picture:
    Is it fixable?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_21new93.JPG Views:	0 Size:	501.3 KB ID:	1104310
    Regards

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by ms spot View Post
    Thank you!
    I have chosen 3 pictures for re-editing (I have increased sharpening and decreased contrast but hopefully not too much or too little ), are these versions better now or are there still any issues?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp39.JPG
Views:	195
Size:	425.3 KB
ID:	1103927Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp53.JPG
Views:	202
Size:	423.4 KB
ID:	1103928Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp76.jpg
Views:	198
Size:	415.2 KB
ID:	1103929
    Thanks for your advice,
    Regards, ms
    1. ok for me
    2-3. borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • ms spot
    replied
    Thank you!
    I have chosen 3 pictures for re-editing (I have increased sharpening and decreased contrast but hopefully not too much or too little ), are these versions better now or are there still any issues?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp39.JPG
Views:	195
Size:	425.3 KB
ID:	1103927Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp53.JPG
Views:	202
Size:	423.4 KB
ID:	1103928Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20newp76.jpg
Views:	198
Size:	415.2 KB
ID:	1103929
    Thanks for your advice,
    Regards, ms

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X