Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JuklicekCZ - Pre-Screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello,
    I just wanted to double-check this rejection.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    It is rejected for cut off because of the tail apparently, however, eventhough the crop is really close I dont think there would actually be a missing part.
    Shall I understand the rejection more like a centering issue, or can a close crop result into a cut off as well?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Ok, thank you very much for your service.
    I ended up uploading them almost unedited (colorwise).
    Please don't tell me now, that they are still hash, because now, they are like black -2 in the lightroom sliders.
    Ok for me; can't say for others.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Ok, thank you very much for your service.
    I ended up uploading them almost unedited (colorwise).
    Please don't tell me now, that they are still hash, because now, they are like black -2 in the lightroom sliders.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    Thank you, I have tried to reduce the blacks even more, however, would't the historgram be a problem now?
    I mean specifically the gap on the left.
    A bit better. I usually don't check the histogram when screening unless I need to confirm something. I suspect most screeners are the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    These are slightly improved.
    Thank you, I have tried to reduce the blacks even more, however, would't the historgram be a problem now?
    I mean specifically the gap on the left.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post

    Thanks, I tried to brighten the darks a bit.
    Would these be acceptable?
    These are slightly improved.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline harsh contrast on the first two, otherwise ok for me.
    Thanks, I tried to brighten the darks a bit.
    Would these be acceptable?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello, may I get a feedback on theese?
    What concerns me most is contrast, Processing (overprocessed) and sharpness.
    Thank you very much
    Borderline harsh contrast on the first two, otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello, may I get a feedback on theese?
    What concerns me most is contrast, Processing (overprocessed) and sharpness.
    Thank you very much
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Ok, thank you.
    Will probably keep it then.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Thank you,
    And what about this one?
    I suppose, that the sharpness should be sufficient, but would isnt the light situation already too problematic?
    It was already quite a late afternoon.
    Borderline backlit/contrast, and some soft areas.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Thank you,
    And what about this one?
    I suppose, that the sharpness should be sufficient, but would isnt the light situation already too problematic?
    It was already quite a late afternoon.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello,
    Would these to be acceptable?
    Thanks.
    Ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Hello,
    Would these to be acceptable?
    Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    from the same day yes - From the same PHASE no (take-off / landing / taxying / parked ac)

    Regards
    Alex
    Hmm, thank you for the clarification.
    But apparently, there were considered to be similar.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X