Who needs help with their scans / rejects?? We can help you!

[Siegi N.]

To me it is not too soft, but it is borderline and some screeners have a slight higher level of acceptance. In this case other screeners than me did the screening, and voted to reject. Nothing more, nothing less.

cheers, Pamela

Thank Pamela

But, it's similar photo of Condor?

Siegi.

[Bjorn1979]

Maybe it's not the right place to ask but why did it took so long before this picture was screened ?

[photoid=7117691]

It had to be my 2.000th, now it's picture 2.002

[LX-A343]

It needed more screeners to take a look at and to cast their vote, while the others were "smoothly" accepted.

[Bjorn1979]

Hmm allright, i hoped it had been added to the database straight away

[llpilch]

Hi everybody

I've got this rejection: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3437576

I submitted an appeal citing the item 1.1.8 of the Photo Upload Guidelines, what says that photos like these are accepted, with this example: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6109388

The answer for the appeal was:
Your appeal for photo id 3437576 has been processed and has been rejected.
Admin Comments >> here it simply does not work
>> http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3437576


Why doesn't work? My photo show the same thing of that A321, i can't see any reason for "simply does not work"...


EDIT: sorry for posting in the wrong place, thanks for moving

First: rejection with no criteria, second: nobody can give me an answer, third, after 4 or 5 more injust rejections, call me a lier in another rejection with no criteria

What was just a hobby for me now made me very disappointed...

I didn't wait it from you, guys

[LX-A343]

In your photo almost the whole aircraft is sharp, with the exception of the tail. This looks somehow weird, which at the end ended up in a rejection.

and where did we call you a liar?

[pilotgolfer]

I'm honestly a little stumped with these.
Did I miss the warbird/vintage category on both of these?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3440677

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3440649

Thanks

[Alex - Spot-This !]

I'm honestly a little stumped with these.
Did I miss the warbird/vintage category on both of these?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3440677

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3440649

Thanks

The C-45 needs the "civil" Genre (that was the rejection reason, you had selected it as military)

The A-10 needs no category at all

From the screening guideline
Warbird/vintage : This category is to be selected for old planes (anything that was not built after 1970, or where the production started before 1970), planes that are no longer in regular service and planes in museums. Also, replicas of vintage aircraft need the "vintage" category.

Regards
Alex

[pilotgolfer]

Ah, ok.
I'll give them both another go, then.
I obviously need to study up on the guidelines a little closer!
Thanks for the info!

[llpilch]

In your photo almost the whole aircraft is sharp, with the exception of the tail. This looks somehow weird, which at the end ended up in a rejection.

and where did we call you a liar?

Thank you for your response about the PR-GUF photo, i'll try to fix the tail.

About the liar, i think we resolved it via e-mail

Regards

[hdgrubb]

Need some help with this one please:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3448282

Where is the blur and which category was wrong? Is it considered a vintage? I have another in queue of this same a/c and would like to correct categories before screening.

Thanks

[yash777]

Hello screeners,

This one got rejected saying:

Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)

Is the aircraft too low or too high in the frame?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3455300

Thanks
Yash

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hello screeners,

This one got rejected saying:

Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered)

Is the aircraft too low or too high in the frame?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3455300

Thanks
Yash

Hi Yash,
The plane is a bit too low in the frame.

Regards
Alex

[yash777]

Thank you Alex!

[Oliver P.]

A bit confused on the wrong titles here - I appealed but got re-rejected. There is no "Oneworld" airline to check like at Airliners.net; I simply put G-CIVP and
EGLL in the autofill.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3451791

Thanks for the help!