Tweet
Can someone tell me where the Artifacts are? This picture is saved with quality 12 (max in photoshop).
-
Can someone tell me where the Artifacts are? This picture is saved with quality 12 (max in photoshop). -
For trained eyes the sky looks very blotchy. Use the "check for dust" tool to see the big pixels yourself. This is often due to the use of filters during editing. No matter how high quality you save your shots, those filters will always kill your sky resolution.Originally posted by DirtyCrow View Post
Regards
AlexComment
-
Originally posted by ErezS View Post
Strong ccw rotation needed., don't ask me for reference, it's my local airport.
For the take-off shot. CW (0.3) rotation needed.Comment
-
Thank you for the explanation.Comment
-
Alex,Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
I know it's your local airport.
But I still don't understand the point of reference here.
Best regards,
Erez.Comment
-
Use the buildings in the background. They should be level. This is not a JP rule, just common sense. I'm now the third screener replying to you regarding the last two photos. I hope, that is enough. We also want to get the queue under control, which is still too large.Originally posted by ErezS View PostComment
-
Excuse me, because this is not good.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806
Instead this, okay?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674
Thank you
Comment
-
Sorry, this is not dark.
The lighting is that of the late afternoon.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415
Thank you
Comment
-
Hi,
I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
Thanks in advance,
JesseComment
-
Don't see any issues with compression, though they do seem a touch high in the frame. Given that wasn't included in the rejection reasons, it shouldn't be an issue the second time around.Originally posted by JVSpotter View PostHi,
I got some photos rejected for various reasons, but mainly compression.
I would like to know if the issue is fixed in the new versions.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]7870[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7871[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]7872[/ATTACH]
Thanks in advance,
JesseComment
-
Okay thanks! Seems that I have finally found the good settings.Originally posted by dlowwa View PostComment
-
Hi there
Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:
This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.
Many thanks
MarkComment
-
It needs a fair amount of brightening. There is lots of room on the right side of the histogram to brighten it without blowing out any highlights. See the left side here:Originally posted by mtaylor334 View PostHi there
Would someone please advise re the histogram and "Dark/Underexposed". I have submitted the following photo:
This looks to be about the light that I saw the aircraft in. It was not sunset, but later afternoon. The histogram looks Ok to me, but I will adjust if someone would kindly advise, as I like this photo.
Many thanks
Mark
It also seems borderline soft/blurry, so I might also suggest uploading at a smaller size than 1800 next time.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Rik86 View PostSorry, this is not dark.
The lighting is that of the late afternoon.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5908415
Thank youI await news.Originally posted by Rik86 View PostExcuse me, because this is not good.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5924806
Instead this, okay?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8623674
Thank you
Thank you
Comment
Comment