NEW Editing advice thread

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Can I please get some help for these two rejects.

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5687145
The angle is such that if add more sharpening the decals will show jaggies and that's what happened with the first upload. Should I apply more USM passes?

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5686273
I thought the exposure was ok on this one.


Regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Can I please get some help for these two rejects.

1. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5687145
The angle is such that if add more sharpening the decals will show jaggies and that's what happened with the first upload. Should I apply more USM passes?

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5686273
I thought the exposure was ok on this one.


Regards,
Siddarth

1. not too bad, just needs a little more sharpening, imho.
2. aircraft in center (main subject) is blown out along the side.

[austinshih90]

A touch oversharpened in places, but generally looks ok.

I'll look into the sharpening stuff. Thanks for the help!

[PeterB]

Got a rejection today for this one:


Reason: Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

As the light was pretty good on this morning I haven't done any crazy experiments regarding editing. In addition, I basically didn't crop the image. So I don't see where a flaw can be found here.
Did the screener maybe refer to the dark fence? If so, this kind of fence doesn't reflect but rather absorbs light when seen from this angle.

Many thanks in advance.
Peter

[dlowwa]

Got a rejection today for this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]7190[/ATTACH]

Reason: Over Processed / Bad postprocessing

As the light was pretty good on this morning I haven't done any crazy experiments regarding editing. In addition, I basically didn't crop the image. So I don't see where a flaw can be found here.
Did the screener maybe refer to the dark fence? If so, this kind of fence doesn't reflect but rather absorbs light when seen from this angle.

Many thanks in advance.
Peter

I can't really see anything either. The Over Processed rejection is most commonly used when editing halos are present, but I don't really see anything like that. Perhaps the screener selected the wrong rejection reason by accident, but beyond that, I can only guess - sorry!

[Rik86]

Hello, I do not understand why I have been discarded, Last Time One of the causes was alone for the dust, now I Correct the image and has been ruled out for another reason.
Thank you.

Photo ID	Airline	Aircraft	Date Screened	LINK
5718617	Terminal	Airport	February 20, 2017	http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5718617
5718609	Terminal	Airport	February 20, 2017	http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5718609

[dlowwa]

Hello, I do not understand why I have been discarded, Last Time One of the causes was alone for the dust, now I Correct the image and has been ruled out for another reason.
Thank you.

Photo ID	Airline	Aircraft	Date Screened	LINK
5718617	Terminal	Airport	February 20, 2017	http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5718617
5718609	Terminal	Airport	February 20, 2017	http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=5718609

The first one is not showing the terminal, just some fence and a gate. Think to yourself, have you ever seen a similar image on Jetphotos?

The second one actually shows part of the terminal, but is not a very good crop or angle.

[Felipe Garcia]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5736337

Rejected for identifiable face, am I allowed to blur a face, or is that not allowed either?

[dlowwa]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=5736337

Rejected for identifiable face, am I allowed to blur a face, or is that not allowed either?

Blurring the face will result in a manipulation rejection. Please select another shot without the person facing the camera.

[Siddarth.Bhandary]

Hi,

Is this not an acceptable crop? Its a tight crop with substantial part of stabilizer not in the frame. We do see such composition in the JP database. Pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5713633

Regards,
Siddarth

[dlowwa]

Hi,

Is this not an acceptable crop? Its a tight crop with substantial part of stabilizer not in the frame. We do see such composition in the JP database. Pic - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5713633

Regards,
Siddarth

Unless there is good reason to crop the stabilizer, those types of images do indeed typically get rejected. Also, if you do go for a wider crop, maybe try at a lower resolution as had I screened it, I would have added Heat Distortion as a rejection reason.

[Felipe Garcia]

Thanks!

[ganevo]

Please Help

Hello, please someone help.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5721561

where should i turn the photo, because i try to turn the photo for horizontal unlevel rejection and get rejected again.



thank you

[LX-A343]

Hello, please someone help.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5721561

where should i turn the photo, because i try to turn the photo for horizontal unlevel rejection and get rejected again.



thank you

please check the link. I only get "No input file specified. "

[ganevo]

please check the link. I only get "No input file specified. "

http://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=5721561

maybe try this.


thank you.