Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pauwelsc - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
    That cockpit shot took me already a lot of forum posts! I hope it's finally fixed now as I am keen to add this to the database! I hope the CW is fine now, I can't change it more. Thanks for the continued support, I know I ask a lot sometimes

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]11272[/ATTACH]
    Leveling is ok now, but the sharpness has been affected. Quite soft now.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      Leveling is ok now, but the sharpness has been affected. Quite soft now.
      I think it’s because of the upload on internet, should be ok on my computer. I will add this one to the queue! Thank you for the help on this one!

      Comment


      • #33
        Hey! Could you have a look on these photos?

        1. Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TFX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1020256 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MQE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	978.6 KB
ID:	1020258 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-GDFU.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,017.9 KB
ID:	1020257 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JHF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1020259 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-MEDK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	550.4 KB
ID:	1020260

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
          Hey! Could you have a look on these photos?

          1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11336[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11338[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11337[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11339[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11340[/ATTACH]
          1. Soft + backlit + noise
          2. Soft
          3. Soft
          4. Ok, but sky is a little bright.
          5. Contrast, borderline backlit.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by B7772ADL View Post
            1. Soft + backlit + noise
            2. Soft
            3. Soft
            4. Ok, but sky is a little bright.
            5. Contrast, borderline backlit.
            Thank you for your quick reply! I added some sharpness to the pictures, is it better now?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JHF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1020262 Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MQE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1020263 Click image for larger version

Name:	G-GDFU.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1020264

            It's difficult to change the brightness of the sky, I slightly changed it but would it be a major issue?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
              Thank you for your quick reply! I added some sharpness to the pictures, is it better now?

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]11345[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]11346[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]11347[/ATTACH]

              It's difficult to change the brightness of the sky, I slightly changed it but would it be a major issue?
              I would keep those ones for the personnel collection honestly, they have little chances of being accepted due to poor contrast (and color issues on the 330) - Maybe the 737 is borderline

              Regards
              Alex

              Comment


              • #37
                I was wondering if this shot would be acceptable for the database. It's taken in the early evening in April around 6 PM so when it would get a positive pre-screen, would I have to tick the category 'night shot'?

                Thanks

                1. Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-HZD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	577.6 KB
ID:	1020314

                and what do you think of this ones?

                2. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-IJM.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020315 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-HXC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	619.2 KB
ID:	1020316

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                  I was wondering if this shot would be acceptable for the database. It's taken in the early evening in April around 6 PM so when it would get a positive pre-screen, would I have to tick the category 'night shot'?

                  Thanks

                  1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11405[/ATTACH]

                  and what do you think of this ones?

                  2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11407[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11408[/ATTACH]
                  1. contrast, soft
                  2. borderline contrast/soft
                  3. contrast, soft, noisy

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by pauwelsc
                    Could you pre-screen these ones? Thanks!

                    1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11424[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11425[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11426[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11427[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11428[/ATTACH]
                    Good Evening

                    In each picture are compression artefacts in the sky, wich leads to a rejection i think.
                    Best Regards from Germany,
                    Julian S.​

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hey JP-team! I edited these pictures and I was wondering if they could get accepted on the database. Thanks a lot!

                      1. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-DEM.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	829.0 KB
ID:	1020333 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-FCB.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	828.5 KB
ID:	1020334 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HTVF.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	871.4 KB
ID:	1020335 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZAG.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020336 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZDA.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	984.5 KB
ID:	1020337

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                        Hey JP-team! I edited these pictures and I was wondering if they could get accepted on the database. Thanks a lot!

                        1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11431[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11432[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11433[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11434[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11435[/ATTACH]
                        As Julian correctly pointed out, there photos show JPG compression artefacts in the sky.
                        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                          As Julian correctly pointed out, there photos show JPG compression artefacts in the sky.
                          On his suggestion, I tried to change it a bit. How can I improve it? Apart from that, are there any problems? Is it so severe in each picture?
                          To be honest, I have seen other pictures accepted with more compression...

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                            On his suggestion, I tried to change it a bit. How can I improve it? Apart from that, are there any problems? Is it so severe in each picture?
                            To be honest, I have seen other pictures accepted with more compression...
                            You can't reduce compression artefacts, once they are in a photo. You can avoid them by following a few simple steps:
                            - When you edit a photo, do all your editing and save the photo only once as the very last step before uploading a photo.
                            - Save with the highest JPG quality settings
                            - If you shoot JPG, make sure the camera is set to highest quality settings
                            - Be careful with noise reducing, as this tends to add JPG compression artefacts
                            My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hey team! I edited these ones... I hope they are acceptable. Thanks

                              1. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-CELG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1020361 2. Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZDA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	813.6 KB
ID:	1020362 3. Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-CDF.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1020363 4. Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JXD.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1020364 5. Click image for larger version

Name:	D-ASTU.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1020365

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by pauwelsc View Post
                                Hey team! I edited these ones... I hope they are acceptable. Thanks

                                1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11460[/ATTACH] 2. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11461[/ATTACH] 3. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11462[/ATTACH] 4. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11463[/ATTACH] 5. [ATTACH=CONFIG]11464[/ATTACH]
                                Hi

                                #1-3 have strong chromatic aberrations. (violet or green edges)

                                #4 and 5 too, not that strong like 1-3 but visible. (you can delete them with lightroom very easy in one click)

                                *For quality of your pictures i can't give a statement
                                because i'm looking on my smartphone.
                                So best wait for a screener here.*

                                Have a nice day!
                                Best Regards from Germany,
                                Julian S.​

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X