wkd001- Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Another question about a reject.

Is this one really too soft?

A bit soft, yes, especially on the tail/nose.

Further more I would like a prescreen of the following photo.

Especially on terms of contrast, softness, horizon and dirt.

Soft, borderline contrast.

[wkd001]

A bit soft, yes, especially on the tail/nose.



Soft, borderline contrast.

Thanks Dana,



I've received this softness reject https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11669738 , but I would like to receive some guidance in this one, as I really have diffculties in understanding where this one is exactly soft.

I also have this reject for soft, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11674948 ,but I've processed an other photo from this sequence, but I think this one might also be soft ,so i would like to have a prescreen on it on softness and maybe potential other issues.


Thanks in Advance

[dlowwa]

I've received this softness reject, but I would like to receive some guidance in this one, as I really have diffculties in understanding where this one is exactly soft.

I also have this reject for soft, but I've processed an other photo from this sequence, but I think this one might also be soft ,so i would like to have a prescreen on it on softness and maybe potential other issues.

Images are all a bit soft towards the edges. Could be a lens or panning issue.

[wkd001]

Images are all a bit soft towards the edges. Could be a lens or panning issue.

Thanks Dana,

For the Qatar I'm almost sure it was a pannning issue .Dumped a lot of the due to very poor quality.
The Air Canada could have been the same, as it was the only original left of it , and I can;t remember precisely
In the meantime, I have several photos taken with same lens accepted, So don't think that the lens is the issue, but I am careful with it.

In the meantime I have this photo processed, but I would like too know if it's too similar to this one. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9761872




The livery is slightly different and it's almost four years in between although I thought the time has to be longer?
The guidelines and discussions here in the forum are a litlle bit different sometimes.

I also have this photo processed.



But would the contrast and sharpness be sufficient for uploading here? As I have serious doubts about that.

Thanks in advance

[Julian S.]

Thanks Dana,

For the Qatar I'm almost sure it was a pannning issue .Dumped a lot of the due to very poor quality.
The Air Canada could have been the same, as it was the only original left of it , and I can;t remember precisely
In the meantime, I have several photos taken with same lens accepted, So don't think that the lens is the issue, but I am careful with it.

In the meantime I have this photo processed, but I would like too know if it's too similar to this one. https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9761872




The livery is slightly different and it's almost four years in between although I thought the time has to be longer?
The guidelines and discussions here in the forum are a litlle bit different sometimes.

I also have this photo processed.



But would the contrast and sharpness be sufficient for uploading here? As I have serious doubts about that.

Thanks in advance

Hi,

KLM is not similar to the one in the db already as of the livery change. But it seems compressed and the contrast is not that good as of the position of the sun.
The Emirates A380 has the same contrast issue than the KLM.

[wkd001]

Hello,

Got this one rejected some days ago. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11785865

Don't have any idea why there should be JPEG compression artefats in this photo.
Is there any wayto recognize this.
https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1714504397.jpg.
I see a little bit ofpurple fringe around the tail and a litlle bit above the fuseelage..
Is that it?.
I also see purple dots om some spotos in the sky, but i haven't done anything to the sky
I have seen that more, but can't remember it being that a problem
Just for my understanding, in that case, I'shoud know, what would have caused it

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Got this one rejected some days ago. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11785865

Don't have any idea why there should be JPEG compression artefats in this photo.
Is there any wayto recognize this.
https://www.jetphotos.com/members/sh...1714504397.jpg.
I see a little bit ofpurple fringe around the tail and a litlle bit above the fuseelage..
Is that it?.
I also see purple dots om some spotos in the sky, but i haven't done anything to the sky
I have seen that more, but can't remember it being that a problem
Just for my understanding, in that case, I'shoud know, what would have caused it

Pretty severe compression in the sky/on the aircraft. Just look at how NOT smooth the lines on the livery are.

[wkd001]

Pretty severe compression in the sky/on the aircraft. Just look at how NOT smooth the lines on the livery are.

Dana,

I also remember sharpening this one quite roughly, as the original wasn't that great and I wanted to put this one into the DB.for myself as a special livery.,
I went too far with it clearly as it looked at least very oversharpened to me
I've tried my luck with another shot of it.

Now have this reject.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11819175.
The serial has fallen away, but when I test it in the upload menu, the serial just pops up in the dropdown menu under the registration
I am sure, this also Happened on his rejected attempt..
Should I just re upload it?

[dlowwa]

Dana,

I also remember sharpening this one quite roughly, as the original wasn't that great and I wanted to put this one into the DB.for myself as a special livery.,
I went too far with it clearly as it looked at least very oversharpened to me
I've tried my luck with another shot of it.

Now have this reject.https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11819175.
The serial has fallen away, but when I test it in the upload menu, the serial just pops up in the dropdown menu under the registration
I am sure, this also Happened on his rejected attempt..
Should I just re upload it?

Yes, please re-upload with the correct info.

[wkd001]

Yes, please re-upload with the correct info.

OK Dana, I've Done that.

Today I received this reject for contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11838871 . but I really don't know what's the issue here.
There is sun on the aircraft, contrast is definitely not too harsh, but in my idea OK as everything is visible.
An expanation would be appreciated

Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

OK Dana, I've Done that.

Today I received this reject for contrast https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11838871 . but I really don't know what's the issue here.
There is sun on the aircraft, contrast is definitely not too harsh, but in my idea OK as everything is visible.
An expanation would be appreciated

Thanks in advance

Flat light/overcast conditions.

[wkd001]

Flat light/overcast conditions.

There was flat light as the sun is visible reflecting on the tail of the aircraft.
I've misjudged it anyway as I see the aircraft not coming out of the sky now, So I''ll leave this one

What's wrong with the contrast here? I have really no idea on this one. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11847296
I assume the LH side of the aircraft is too soft? (especially around cockpit?)

Any guidance would be appreciated.

[dlowwa]

There was flat light as the sun is visible reflecting on the tail of the aircraft.
I've misjudged it anyway as I see the aircraft not coming out of the sky now, So I''ll leave this one

What's wrong with the contrast here? I have really no idea on this one. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11847296
I assume the LH side of the aircraft is too soft? (especially around cockpit?)

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Also a little flat light, although ok for me.

[wkd001]

Also a little flat light, although ok for me.

Thank you Dana,

I was scared bout overexposing the LH side, so that might cause the issue,
Do you agree with the softness note? (For LH side especially),
As i can't figure that one really out myself.

[dlowwa]

Thank you Dana,

I was scared bout overexposing the LH side, so that might cause the issue,
Do you agree with the softness note? (For LH side especially),
As i can't figure that one really out myself.

Yes, some soft spots.