Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Majky737 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I kindly ask you for your opinion, if attached photo is acceptable in terms of contrast / exposure.
    Exposure ok, but contrast not looking very good.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I kindly ask you for your opinion, if attached photo is acceptable in terms of contrast / exposure.

    Thank you.
    M.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HSBL.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	1142512

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I am seeking for some advice on this reject:

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I have started once again with processing and want to ask if new edit is somehow better or not. To be honest, I can not figure out what caused jpeg compression, as I save pictures on maximum quality and I did not changed my processing flow:


    Secondly, I want to ask you for prescreening of following picture, as I have bad experiences with taking pictures trought glass
    Both images soft/noisy. That may have been misidentified as compression on the former image, especially if it's a heavier crop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I am seeking for some advice on this reject:

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    I have started once again with processing and want to ask if new edit is somehow better or not. To be honest, I can not figure out what caused jpeg compression, as I save pictures on maximum quality and I did not changed my processing flow:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	KJFK_TWR_II.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	494.8 KB
ID:	1142212

    Secondly, I want to ask you for prescreening of following picture, as I have bad experiences with taking pictures trought glass

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LPD_II.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	655.5 KB
ID:	1142213

    Thank you for your time.

    Marian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post

    I have two more pics to ask:

    1. - my intention was to process this picture as ramp shot. However, I am not sure if lamp posts obstructing Airbuses are not too disturbing. Will be ramp shot like that rejected of obstruction as well?

    2. - I have visited TWA hotel and taken shot of Connie, however I forget my 15 - 55 lenses so I had to use my Phone. As this edit's origin is phone, do you think it might be acceptable, or the quality is simply not there?

    Thank you for your time and reply.
    M.
    1. dark, horizon, and possibly obstr./clutter, yes
    2. borderline oversharpened/compression, and a bit soft/blurry on the right side

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Tug ok; stairs blocking the tug not ok.
    ok thank you.

    I have two more pics to ask:

    1. - my intention was to process this picture as ramp shot. However, I am not sure if lamp posts obstructing Airbuses are not too disturbing. Will be ramp shot like that rejected of obstruction as well?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	jbramp.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	671.7 KB
ID:	1140926

    2. - I have visited TWA hotel and taken shot of Connie, however I forget my 15 - 55 lenses so I had to use my Phone. As this edit's origin is phone, do you think it might be acceptable, or the quality is simply not there?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TWA.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	557.4 KB
ID:	1140927

    Thank you for your time and reply.
    M.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I want to ask if attached photo is acceptable in terms of attached obstructing tug vehicle or not (and will be rejected for obstruction)
    Tug ok; stairs blocking the tug not ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I want to ask if attached photo is acceptable in terms of attached obstructing tug vehicle or not (and will be rejected for obstruction)

    Thank you
    M.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	jetb.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	811.0 KB
ID:	1140900

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello,

    I worked again on photo rejected here for being dark and noise:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Are these still issues on new edit?

    Thank you for your time.
    Noise and exposure would no longer be issues for me, but unfortunately there are some issues with softness/blur (tail) and horizon that were missed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello,

    I worked again on photo rejected here for being dark and noise:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Are these still issues on new edit?

    Thank you for your time.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SE-RLY_I.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	897.7 KB
ID:	1135280

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello JP crew,

    Is the attached photo acceptable in terms of backlit? Part of the tail is on shadow, so I am not fully sure. Thank you for answer
    A bit dark, but not quite backlit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello JP crew,

    Is the attached photo acceptable in terms of backlit? Part of the tail is on shadow, so I am not fully sure. Thank you for answer

    Marian

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OO-SSL.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	988.4 KB
ID:	1134508

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hello JP team,

    I want to ask, if the cone under left prop is considered as obstruction and can result as rejection. I used more angles, but the cone was still obstructing the plane so I choosed photo where I think it was not so painful. Photo is not processed yet, please ignore contrast issues and dust spots.
    Would probably depend on rarity of image. If we are likely to receive another, better (unobstructed) image in the future, then yes it would be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Majky737
    replied
    Hello JP team,

    I want to ask, if the cone under left prop is considered as obstruction and can result as rejection. I used more angles, but the cone was still obstructing the plane so I choosed photo where I think it was not so painful. Photo is not processed yet, please ignore contrast issues and dust spots.

    Thank you for your answer.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ATR_cropped_resized.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	616.2 KB
ID:	1133811

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Majky737 View Post
    Hi,

    today I have received this reject:
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    as horizont looks fine to me, I want to ask what to take as reference in this case? Does it need CW rotation?

    Thank you
    M.
    I see nothing wrong with the horizon. Image has been added.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X