Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Which categories were wrong or missing then? Apologizes
    This is a small prop.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Which categories were wrong or missing then? Apologizes

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7975319

    with this reject. could you please let me know which info was bad/incorrect? The aircraft is a Beechcraft Super King Air B200GT with a S/N BY-156 owned by the Missouri State Highway Patrol. I inputted all this info and was not provided a comment by the screener as to which info was incorrect/bad. I just want to get this right and wanted to check with you to see which parts I was missing. Thank you!
    Check the rejection again. Was not rejected for bad info.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied


    with this reject. could you please let me know which info was bad/incorrect? The aircraft is a Beechcraft Super King Air B200GT with a S/N BY-156 owned by the Missouri State Highway Patrol. I inputted all this info and was not provided a comment by the screener as to which info was incorrect/bad. I just want to get this right and wanted to check with you to see which parts I was missing. Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Appreciate your input, would like one last pair of eyes on these noise fixes. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812-2 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	772.6 KB
ID:	1084244Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816-2 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	1084245
    1. soft/noisy
    2. borderline contrast/noise

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Appreciate your input, would like one last pair of eyes on these noise fixes. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812-2 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	772.6 KB
ID:	1084244Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816-2 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	110
Size:	539.1 KB
ID:	1084245

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would these fix any of the problems that were stated above?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	706.2 KB
ID:	1084185Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	126
Size:	478.1 KB
ID:	1084186
    Unfortunately the noise reduction you've used has smeared a lot of the fine detail, as it typically does. Not quite as noticeable on the cabin shot, but you can really see it in the cockpit one.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would these fix any of the problems that were stated above?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	706.2 KB
ID:	1084185Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816 N317SK 031120.jpg
Views:	126
Size:	478.1 KB
ID:	1084186

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    What are your thoughts with these galley and flight deck photos? Looking to see if there are any issues with noise, exposure and contrast. Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812edit1.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	767.2 KB
ID:	1084134Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816edit1.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	698.4 KB
ID:	1084135
    A few blown out highlights, yes, but the bigger problem is that there is a significant amount of noise in the images.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    What are your thoughts with these galley and flight deck photos? Looking to see if there are any issues with noise, exposure and contrast. Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08812edit1.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	767.2 KB
ID:	1084134Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08816edit1.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	698.4 KB
ID:	1084135

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Can you please provide some feedback on these photos. Thank you. Looking for feedback on contrast, exposure, heat haze(if any) and horizon. Please let me know if anything else is wrong if I missed anything. Thank you again

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06881 N511DN 022120.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	703.6 KB
ID:	1083908Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01320 DAIMN 011020.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	698.5 KB
ID:	1083909
    A bit of haze on the second, but no other obvious concerns.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Can you please provide some feedback on these photos. Thank you. Looking for feedback on contrast, exposure, heat haze(if any) and horizon. Please let me know if anything else is wrong if I missed anything. Thank you again

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06881 N511DN 022120.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	703.6 KB
ID:	1083908Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01320 DAIMN 011020.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	698.5 KB
ID:	1083909

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    So the sun in the first photo would be an automatic rejection since it is too bright?
    Saying it would not be acceptable indeed means it would be rejected.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    So the sun in the first photo would be an automatic rejection since it is too bright?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Attempting a different aspect photo, yet again, and looking for feedback on these photos if they would be acceptable? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08458 N314PQ 030720.jpg
Views:	167
Size:	642.7 KB
ID:	1083727Click image for larger version

Name:	20200307_113920 N314PQ 030720.jpg
Views:	166
Size:	460.7 KB
ID:	1083728
    Neither would. Very harsh light on the first, and window glare on the second.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X