Advice/Confirmation requested by jakerepp

[jakerepp]

Screener(s) indicated a little CW rotation was needed.

Oh, well that's another question then. I'm not seeing the notes in emails now.

[jakerepp]

These 737's both look underexposed to me, but I'm not sure what setting would've caused it. I always shoot aperture priority and had exposure comp at neutral. Is it just the angle of the sun and the vast background? Not sure if there's a better white balance or some other setting for these conditions. Do you have an opinion on either the quality or the settings?

Also, does the Sr22 look okay?

[dlowwa]

These 737's both look underexposed to me, but I'm not sure what setting would've caused it. I always shoot aperture priority and had exposure comp at neutral. Is it just the angle of the sun and the vast background? Not sure if there's a better white balance or some other setting for these conditions. Do you have an opinion on either the quality or the settings?

Also, does the Sr22 look okay?

1. dark/contrast, borderline soft
2. dark/contrast

angle of the light/sun - nose bright, rest of aircraft darker

3. ok for me

[jakerepp]

1. dark/contrast, borderline soft
2. dark/contrast

angle of the light/sun - nose bright, rest of aircraft darker

3. ok for me

Make sense. No setting will fix that then, I suppose.

[jakerepp]

Does this look okay? Can't tell if there is vignetting in the top of the frame.

[jakerepp]

Horizon rejection that is disagree with. The light pole is leaning but building verticals look perfect to me. I've taken enough photos are SDL now to know a lot of the light poles there are askew. Screener comment did say clockwise needed, but I don't think that applies if using the building as a guide.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11345729

[dlowwa]

Horizon rejection that is disagree with. The light pole is leaning but building verticals look perfect to me. I've taken enough photos are SDL now to know a lot of the light poles there are askew. Screener comment did say clockwise needed, but I don't think that applies if using the building as a guide.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11345729

Looks like it needs CW rotation to me.

[jakerepp]

Do these look okay?

[dlowwa]

Do these look okay?

Don't see any major issues.

[jakerepp]

Trying different things out, is this crop okay? And the second one, I'm 99% sure the quality isn't there, but I didn't realize what I got in the background so I figured I'd try to edit it somehow.

[dlowwa]

Trying different things out, is this crop okay? And the second one, I'm 99% sure the quality isn't there, but I didn't realize what I got in the background so I figured I'd try to edit it somehow.

1. needs tighter crop
2. dark, soft, and centering is borderline

[jakerepp]

Two hot oddballs (compositionally) for pre-screening please Contrast is wild

[dlowwa]

Two hot oddballs (compositionally) for pre-screening please Contrast is wild

1. dark
2. ok for me

[jakerepp]

These are all heavy crops so I'm not sure if quality is retained enough, so pre-screening please.

[dlowwa]

These are all heavy crops so I'm not sure if quality is retained enough, so pre-screening please.

Dark, borderline soft.