MarkLawrence - Editing Advice

[MarkLawrence]

I am attempting an edit in Lightroom rather than Photoshop for the first time. Please can I get a prescreen on this image.

[dlowwa]

I am attempting an edit in Lightroom rather than Photoshop for the first time. Please can I get a prescreen on this image.

Contrast is flat, also a touch soft.

[MarkLawrence]

Thanks Dana - will work in it.

[MarkLawrence]

I made some refinements to the image, please can I get a prescreen again on this image?

[TRTPUwU]

It looks better, should be OK

[dlowwa]

I made some refinements to the image, please can I get a prescreen again on this image?

Contrast is ok, but still soft, maybe even more so than the first attempt.

[MarkLawrence]

Wow - that is interesting .. because I added sharpening .. oaky I will see what I can do with it.

[MarkLawrence]

I have a question regarding this rejection. First of all, I bit of a personal rant, because this is something I find annoying. The first time this was rejected, yes, I made the mistake of typing in the registration wrong, so that was my fault. I correct that, and it is immediately rejected for horizon. Per the attached, I used the verticals of the left hand door of the building behind the aircraft and to me, it appears okay. So, is there another place to align the verticals? And please screeners, PLEASE can you put all reasons on a rejection? I now have 2 rejections that I need to wait 14 days to clear, whereas if it was all on the first one, I could have double checked all the elements.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11555032#modal-large-photo

[dlowwa]

I have a question regarding this rejection. First of all, I bit of a personal rant, because this is something I find annoying. The first time this was rejected, yes, I made the mistake of typing in the registration wrong, so that was my fault. I correct that, and it is immediately rejected for horizon. Per the attached, I used the verticals of the left hand door of the building behind the aircraft and to me, it appears okay. So, is there another place to align the verticals? And please screeners, PLEASE can you put all reasons on a rejection? I now have 2 rejections that I need to wait 14 days to clear, whereas if it was all on the first one, I could have double checked all the elements.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued...al-large-photo

Verticals are all leaning left, but yes, should have been caught on first screening.

[MarkLawrence]

Could I get a pre-screen on this please. A new lens,

[TRTPUwU]

I dont know why, but it looks slightly oversharpened above the air transat text, and slightly soft in the tail to me (imho)

[dlowwa]

Could I get a pre-screen on this please. A new lens,

Heat hazed.

[MarkLawrence]

Thanks Dana!

[MarkLawrence]

Can a screener help me here please.. this was rejected as bad info: Airline. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11582878. When I loaded it, I used KLAX in both the aircraft and airline .. and then selected Terminal. It comes out as follows in the rejection:

• Reg: KLAX photos
• Aircraft: Airport
• Airline: Terminal

So, please can you tell me what I am doing wrong! IS this not an image of the terminals? It is Airport Overview? I think I tried that before and it was rejected for bad info as well. Just need t he correct combination ..

Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Can a screener help me here please.. this was rejected as bad info: Airline. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11582878. When I loaded it, I used KLAX in both the aircraft and airline .. and then selected Terminal. It comes out as follows in the rejection:

Don't know that I agree, but screener comments on the rejection: 'Ramp' is better.