Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening / postprocessing rejection advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Hello,

    Many thanks for your advices. I have tried to fix this too dark issue, can I have new advice about the new version, please ?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	887.3 KB
ID:	1109063

    Best regards
    Jean-Philippe

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
      Hello,

      Many thanks for your advices. I have tried to fix this too dark issue, can I have new advice about the new version, please ?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	887.3 KB
ID:	1109063

      Best regards
      Jean-Philippe
      It still quite dark for me.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
        Hello,

        Many thanks for your advices. I have tried to fix this too dark issue, can I have new advice about the new version, please ?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	887.3 KB
ID:	1109063

        Best regards
        Jean-Philippe
        Still lacking highlights.
        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

        Comment


        • #64
          Hi !

          Thank you for your advices, here's a new try, could it be better like this ?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	881.5 KB
ID:	1109248
          Jean-Philippe

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
            Hi !

            Thank you for your advices, here's a new try, could it be better like this ?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	881.5 KB
ID:	1109248
            Jean-Philippe
            Still a bit dark:

            Click image for larger version

Name:	image_38225.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	932.7 KB
ID:	1109264

            Comment


            • #66
              Hi,

              Thank you very much for your example, here a last try, is it good like that ?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	944.0 KB
ID:	1109458

              Jean-Philippe

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                Hi,

                Thank you very much for your example, here a last try, is it good like that ?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1975 FAF4105 A330-MRTT 041.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	944.0 KB
ID:	1109458

                Jean-Philippe
                Would be ok for me.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Thank you for your help.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Hello,

                    I would like to have advices about these 3 photos:

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	913.2 KB
ID:	1110039Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	948.7 KB
ID:	1110040Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	1,013.2 KB
ID:	1110041

                    Jean-Philippe SL

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                      Hello,

                      I would like to have advices about these 3 photos
                      All images are a bit too soft for 1800pix.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Hello,

                        Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	801.2 KB
ID:	1110279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	816.5 KB
ID:	1110280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	796.6 KB
ID:	1110281

                        And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	872.1 KB
ID:	1110282

                        Thank you
                        Jean-Philippe

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                          Hello,

                          Thank you for your help, I have reduced the photos to 1650pix for 1 and 2 and 1500pix, I think that is better now but what do you think please ?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2108 VY2972 Vueling Barcelona-NTE A320-214 EC-LVP.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	801.2 KB
ID:	1110279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2134 XK321 Toulouse-NTE Air Corsica ATR42-500 F-HAIB.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	816.5 KB
ID:	1110280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2169 TU209 NTE-Djerba div. Tunis Tunisair A319-112 TS-IMQ.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	796.6 KB
ID:	1110281

                          And I would like to submit another photo to your judgement:

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	872.1 KB
ID:	1110282

                          Thank you
                          Jean-Philippe
                          1 & 3 ok for me; 2 I'm still not sure the quality is there for the size; 4 definitely too soft for that size. The conclusion I guess is for you to avoid anything larger than 1600 pix, and under 1500 would be better.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

                            Jean-Philippe

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Jean-Philippe SL View Post
                              Thank you for your advice but I don't understand how do you find my photos too soft, do you look them with a particular software ? I know that is a frequent issue on my photos so I give attention to this subject, and the CRJ seems to be sharp on my screen...

                              Jean-Philippe
                              Usually most images are seen at full-size in a browser, no special software. Looking again at the CRJ I'll take back the 'definitely' and replace it with 'a bit' Overall it's not bad, though some softness shows towards the nose.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Hello,

                                I think that you have a better browser than me, so here is a new version of the CRJ reduced to 1500pix:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2281.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	602.8 KB
ID:	1110756

                                Also, I submitt another photo, what do you think please ?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2294.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	737.5 KB
ID:	1110757

                                Jean-Philippe SL

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X