Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James Dinsdale - Pre-Screening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post

    My apologies, I did intend to delete from the queue, I think I may have just forgotten to "confirm" the box before changing browser tab to the forum, completely unintentional
    Well, it still is in the queue. I am done with it.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

      Well, it still is in the queue. I am done with it.
      Nope, I am sorry, it isn't - I deleted it after Dlowwa pointed out. The link still works, but it isn't in the queue, so if you re-clicked the link I do not know why but it still is hosted on the site
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #48
        Morning, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8269057 had this rejected for overexposure, would such an amendment be acceptable?
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
          Morning, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8269057 had this rejected for overexposure, would such an amendment be acceptable?
          Exposure should be ok now, yes.

          Comment


          • #50
            Morning, I had this aircraft rejected for cutoff on the tail, but as the logo wasn't cut off why would this still be unacceptable? If I kept the whole tail in shot then the majority of the airframe would be at the bottom of the photo which then might lead to a crop rejection for not being central no?


            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8279962

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
              Morning, I had this aircraft rejected for cutoff on the tail, but as the logo wasn't cut off why would this still be unacceptable?
              Because the tail is cut off.

              Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
              If I kept the whole tail in shot then the majority of the airframe would be at the bottom of the photo which then might lead to a crop rejection for not being central no?
              No.

              Comment


              • #52
                Afternoon, do you see any problem with this photo? Particularly the lighting
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
                  Afternoon, do you see any problem with this photo? Particularly the lighting
                  According to our guidelines,

                  If the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.

                  So yes, backlit

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by meneses24 View Post

                    According to our guidelines,

                    If the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.

                    So yes, backlit
                    Thanks for the quick response. I did think it was a problem but wanted to check

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Morning, would this be rejected for backlit or anything else? 6am lighting
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
                        Morning, would this be rejected for backlit or anything else? 6am lighting
                        Not backlit. Don't see any other major issues.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Afternoon. I have this photo which was shot which, when I enter into the queue to look at the settings, appears to have vignetting which I haven't adjusted/added. I take this photo through a cockpit window but sill the glass of the lens has a small vignetting in the sky, would this be a rejection?
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
                            Afternoon. I have this photo which was shot which, when I enter into the queue to look at the settings, appears to have vignetting which I haven't adjusted/added. I take this photo through a cockpit window but sill the glass of the lens has a small vignetting in the sky, would this be a rejection?
                            I'd say the vignetting does not look that bad, but it is visible enough and it's quite soft. Cockpit windows are our enemies

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by meneses24 View Post

                              I'd say the vignetting does not look that bad, but it is visible enough and it's quite soft. Cockpit windows are our enemies
                              Can I ask what the boundary/limitation is for vignetting? As I have just had this photo rejected, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8294463 A) for backlit, which I do not believe is true, but secondly "Vignetting is not allowed" - I haven't applied any vignetting to this photo that was taken outside, the full horizon in the background causes a natural change in the colour of the sky even to the naked eye.

                              Especially when this photo was accepted afterwards https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9796112

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Evening, would you think this is an acceptable upload?
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X