James Dinsdale - Pre-Screening/Editing Advice

[LX-A343]

My apologies, I did intend to delete from the queue, I think I may have just forgotten to "confirm" the box before changing browser tab to the forum, completely unintentional

Well, it still is in the queue. I am done with it.

[JamesDC152]

Well, it still is in the queue. I am done with it.

Nope, I am sorry, it isn't - I deleted it after Dlowwa pointed out. The link still works, but it isn't in the queue, so if you re-clicked the link I do not know why but it still is hosted on the site

[JamesDC152]

Morning, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8269057 had this rejected for overexposure, would such an amendment be acceptable?

[dlowwa]

Morning, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8269057 had this rejected for overexposure, would such an amendment be acceptable?

Exposure should be ok now, yes.

[JamesDC152]

Morning, I had this aircraft rejected for cutoff on the tail, but as the logo wasn't cut off why would this still be unacceptable? If I kept the whole tail in shot then the majority of the airframe would be at the bottom of the photo which then might lead to a crop rejection for not being central no?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8279962

[dlowwa]

Morning, I had this aircraft rejected for cutoff on the tail, but as the logo wasn't cut off why would this still be unacceptable?

Because the tail is cut off.

If I kept the whole tail in shot then the majority of the airframe would be at the bottom of the photo which then might lead to a crop rejection for not being central no?

No.

[JamesDC152]

Afternoon, do you see any problem with this photo? Particularly the lighting

[meneses24]

Afternoon, do you see any problem with this photo? Particularly the lighting

According to our guidelines,

If the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.

So yes, backlit

[gdinscoll]

According to our guidelines,

If the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.

So yes, backlit

Thanks for the quick response. I did think it was a problem but wanted to check

[JamesDC152]

Morning, would this be rejected for backlit or anything else? 6am lighting

[dlowwa]

Morning, would this be rejected for backlit or anything else? 6am lighting

Not backlit. Don't see any other major issues.

[JamesDC152]

Afternoon. I have this photo which was shot which, when I enter into the queue to look at the settings, appears to have vignetting which I haven't adjusted/added. I take this photo through a cockpit window but sill the glass of the lens has a small vignetting in the sky, would this be a rejection?

[meneses24]

Afternoon. I have this photo which was shot which, when I enter into the queue to look at the settings, appears to have vignetting which I haven't adjusted/added. I take this photo through a cockpit window but sill the glass of the lens has a small vignetting in the sky, would this be a rejection?

I'd say the vignetting does not look that bad, but it is visible enough and it's quite soft. Cockpit windows are our enemies

[JamesDC152]

I'd say the vignetting does not look that bad, but it is visible enough and it's quite soft. Cockpit windows are our enemies

Can I ask what the boundary/limitation is for vignetting? As I have just had this photo rejected, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8294463 A) for backlit, which I do not believe is true, but secondly "Vignetting is not allowed" - I haven't applied any vignetting to this photo that was taken outside, the full horizon in the background causes a natural change in the colour of the sky even to the naked eye.

Especially when this photo was accepted afterwards https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9796112

[JamesDC152]

Evening, would you think this is an acceptable upload?